2014
DOI: 10.1097/yic.0000000000000023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline

Abstract: It is known that newer antidepressants, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), provide advantages in tolerability over antidepressants such as the tricyclics. However, even within the SSRI class, differences in efficacy or tolerability exist between the individual drugs. Among the three most widely prescribed SSRIs are paroxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram. Escitalopram is commonly referred to as an SSRI, but also has well-documented allosteric properties, and thus can be further class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
161
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
161
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, SNRIs show differences in potency for SERT vs. NET with venlafaxine having a preference for SERT over NET, and duloxetine being a more balanced drug with respect to 5-HT and NE reuptake inhibitory potencies [4]. These distinct pharmacological properties may lead to different clinical efficacy and/or tolerability profiles [4,5]. However, possibly due to a lack of validated biomarkers that can reliably predict a patient's response to a given antidepressant, it appears that only 50% of patients diagnosed with MDD go into clinical remission using treatments from these two drug classes regardless of the drug chosen [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, SNRIs show differences in potency for SERT vs. NET with venlafaxine having a preference for SERT over NET, and duloxetine being a more balanced drug with respect to 5-HT and NE reuptake inhibitory potencies [4]. These distinct pharmacological properties may lead to different clinical efficacy and/or tolerability profiles [4,5]. However, possibly due to a lack of validated biomarkers that can reliably predict a patient's response to a given antidepressant, it appears that only 50% of patients diagnosed with MDD go into clinical remission using treatments from these two drug classes regardless of the drug chosen [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although a review showed that escitalopram may be more effective than sertraline [7], this can be applied to depression but not to acute pelvic pain. To our knowledge, there are no clinical reports specifically investigating the effects of antidepressants on acute pelvic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively fast onset of the therapeutic response, the ease of selecting the minimum therapeutic dose, the good tolerance, safety, and effi cacy of the treatment of DD of different structures and severities in different conditions, the potential for improving patients' social functioning and quality of life, and conservation of resources allow SSRI, including escitalopram, to be regarded as fi rst-choice antidepressants [80,85,86] close to the "ideal" [35] because of the optimum balance of tolerance and clinical effi cacy. It is important to study how satisfactory treatment is [87] and to clarify the dynamics of patients' quality of life associated with treatment compliance, as well as the real resource-sparing potential of antidepressants, including the antisuicidal and antiaggressive effects and decreases in the family burden of care; the contribution of psychosocial interventions on the background of rational pharmacotherapy should be considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%