1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(96)01309-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative STM and SPA-LEED study on the evolution of strain induced stripe pattern on Cu/Ni(100)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protrusion, h Cu , is mostly sensitive to the intensity ratio between the transverse and longitudinal facet peaks. The obtained value of 0.5 Å compares favorably with the 0.4 Å obtained from the hard sphere model and high-resolution LEED (SPA-LEED) measurements [14] and the 0.6 Å originally observed by Müller et al [4]. The remaining parameters (b`, e rel , n c ) determine the intensity profiles of the longitudinal scans.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The protrusion, h Cu , is mostly sensitive to the intensity ratio between the transverse and longitudinal facet peaks. The obtained value of 0.5 Å compares favorably with the 0.4 Å obtained from the hard sphere model and high-resolution LEED (SPA-LEED) measurements [14] and the 0.6 Å originally observed by Müller et al [4]. The remaining parameters (b`, e rel , n c ) determine the intensity profiles of the longitudinal scans.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The formation of close-packed stacking faults is in fact an energetically efficient path to strain relief in other film orientations as well. Müller et al. , recently investigated the strain relief mechanisms for Cu layers on Ni(100). Similar to the (111) case, linear stripes of surface buckling were observed by STM.…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model used here for analysis of LEED intensities based on a simple sum of layer-bylayer contributions neglects effects such as intensity oscillations in LEED which can occur in particular for a (0,0) peak due to island growth on a surface. 25 It seems unlikely that an analogous situation would occur for a first-order (1,0) peak, however, nor for higher order peaks. Additionally, by selecting an energy for which the peak intensity is a maximum, these types of destructive interference effects are avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%