2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-5096-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RBF kernel function has advantages compared with other kernel functions including linear, sigmoid, and polynomial kernel functions in terms of nonlinear mapping capability, parameter number, numerical limiting conditions, global superiority, and positive definite [73]. Furthermore, linear kernel function is effective only for linear problems, sigmoid kernel function is not applied widely, and polynomial kernel function suffers from computational difficulties [74]. On the other hand, RBF kernel function can be used for any problems as long as the parameter is selected appropriately [75].…”
Section: Least Squares Support Vector Regression (Lssvr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RBF kernel function has advantages compared with other kernel functions including linear, sigmoid, and polynomial kernel functions in terms of nonlinear mapping capability, parameter number, numerical limiting conditions, global superiority, and positive definite [73]. Furthermore, linear kernel function is effective only for linear problems, sigmoid kernel function is not applied widely, and polynomial kernel function suffers from computational difficulties [74]. On the other hand, RBF kernel function can be used for any problems as long as the parameter is selected appropriately [75].…”
Section: Least Squares Support Vector Regression (Lssvr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, linear kernel function is effective only for linear problems, sigmoid kernel function is not applied widely, and polynomial kernel function suffers from computational difficulties [74]. On the other hand, RBF kernel function can be used for any problems as long as the parameter is selected appropriately [75].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorum et al (2010) studied to set up rainfall-runoff 1 3 85 Page 2 of 9 relationship using ANN and ANFIS models at hydrometric stations on seven sites in Susurluk watershed. Ghorbani et al (2016) investigated the applicability of MLP, RBF and SVM models for the estimation of river flow. The results show that the RBF and MLP models are better for estimation monthly river flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By plotting the 95% CB using the HBMES-1 method introduced in Section 2.4.1, the uncertainty statistics for the 4 entropy models and the global shear stress model introduced in Section 2.2 were obtained and presented in Table 2. According to the researchers' studies, the predictor model is highly reliable if 80-100% of the values are in the desired CB and the model was not able to predict if less than 50% of the values are within the CB [30,32,49,50].…”
Section: Assessment Of Uncertainty Of Four Entropy Models Using the Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty analysis of many hydraulic and hydrological models has been tackled by many researchers using various uncertainty methods [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Lamb et al [41] used measured water depth in a Bayesian procedure as Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) to measure uncertainties for a simple model of the rainfall-runoff distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%