2019
DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d201134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of carbon dioxide absorption capacity of seven urban forest plant species of Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Abstract: Abstract. Daud M, Bustam BM, Arifin B. 2019. A comparative study of carbon dioxide absorption capacity of seven urban forest plant species of Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20: 3372-3379. Global warming has been a major issue affecting all parts of the world in recent years. One method of reducing the impact of global warming is through supporting the green open space. The city government of Banda Aceh, Indonesia has targetted as much as 30% of its area to the formation of green open space. The BNI urban… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…& Thomson (0.058 g) (Lailati et al 2013). Likewise, species member of Combretaceae namely T. bellirica (0.488 g) was higher than Terminalia catappa L. (0.156 g) (Daud et al 2019). The CO2 sequestration ability was not always directly proportional to the mass of CO2 absorbed due to the differences in each species' number and mass of leaves.…”
Section: Potential Plant Species For Restoration and Carbon Sequestra...mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…& Thomson (0.058 g) (Lailati et al 2013). Likewise, species member of Combretaceae namely T. bellirica (0.488 g) was higher than Terminalia catappa L. (0.156 g) (Daud et al 2019). The CO2 sequestration ability was not always directly proportional to the mass of CO2 absorbed due to the differences in each species' number and mass of leaves.…”
Section: Potential Plant Species For Restoration and Carbon Sequestra...mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Absorption is the ability of a plant species through its leaves to absorb carbon, while storage capacity is the ability to store carbon stocks in the form of biomass. Measurement of carbon absorption used the leaf sample method (non-destructive) and carbohydrate test (Lailati 2013;Daud et al 2019). The data included the number of leaves per tree, leaf area measurement per sample 30 g, leaf carbohydrate mass per tree species.…”
Section: Carbon Sequestration Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO2 concentration experienced a decrease from 07.00 a.m. until it once again surpassed the control CO2 concentration at 03.00 p.m. At 11.00 a.m., the concentration of CO2 in Antigonon leptopus with a catchment area of 75% reduced to 258 ppm at an elevation of 0 m. It decreased to 308 ppm at an elevation of 4.5 m and reached a minimum of 223 ppm at an elevation of 8.5 m. Plants were capable of efficiently reduced CO2 through photosynthesis during the daytime. At 11.00 a.m., a substantial amount of carbohydrates was founded in the leaves where photosynthesis occurred efficiently [28].…”
Section: Co2 Concentration Change Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant type, structure, and canopy closure [41], [57], number of stomata [42], number of epidermis, stomata index [33] stomata size [38]. Leaves size and chlorophyll content of leaves [58], as well as leaves area per strand as a divider, were not the same in each type of plant [68], [69].…”
Section: ) Carbohydrate Massmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tectona grandis leaves were thick, large leaves, few stomata, and coarse hair. The amount of carbon dioxide that can be absorbed depends heavily on the size of the leaf sample; the smaller the leaf area, the more carbon dioxide can be absorbed [58], [59]. To aid CO2 diffusion during photosynthesis, stomata open during the day and close at night to lessen transpiration [60], [61], [62].…”
Section: ) Carbohydrate Massmentioning
confidence: 99%