2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12024-020-00284-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable to earlier studies [4,5] we could con rm an effective spread of 12 in (ca. 30 cm) or greater.…”
Section: Probe Spreadsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparable to earlier studies [4,5] we could con rm an effective spread of 12 in (ca. 30 cm) or greater.…”
Section: Probe Spreadsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The video analysis and evaluation of each participant was done by a quasi-blinded expert panel with signi cant volunteer exposure observational experience (thousands of human volunteer exposures). Similar to our previous studies [4,5], each exposure was rated for level of goal achievement and limb muscular capture (table. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Der Ursprung von Elektroschockgeräten liegt in der Landwirtschaft. Das Grundprinzip des Elektrozauns, durch elektrisch ausgelöste Schmerzreize ein [9] und gesundheitlichen Risiken [10].…”
Section: Elektroschockdistanzwaffenunclassified
“…By design, the prongs spread after firing, and they need a minimum distance to ensure maximum effectiveness. A minimum 12-inch spread is recommended for maximum effect (AXON Enterprise, 2019; Ho et al, 2012; Ho et al, 2020). The best effect results when the area between the probes encompasses a large muscle group or more than one muscle group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%