2022
DOI: 10.1051/aacus/2022008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of eight human auditory models of monaural processing

Abstract: A number of auditory models have been developed using diverging approaches, either physiological or perceptual, but they share comparable stages of signal processing, as they are inspired by the same constitutive parts of the auditory system. We compare eight monaural models that are openly accessible in the Auditory Modelling Toolbox. We discuss the considerations required to make the model outputs comparable to each other, as well as the results for the following model processing stages or their equivalents:… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we used a well‐established and widely used model of the auditory periphery (Bruce et al., 2018). This model provides a phenomenological description of the major functional stages of the auditory periphery, from the middle ear up to the auditory nerve (Osses et al., 2022). The implementation used in the present study is available as the routine ‘bruce2018’ within the AMT toolbox (v.1.0) for MATLAB (Majdak et al., 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we used a well‐established and widely used model of the auditory periphery (Bruce et al., 2018). This model provides a phenomenological description of the major functional stages of the auditory periphery, from the middle ear up to the auditory nerve (Osses et al., 2022). The implementation used in the present study is available as the routine ‘bruce2018’ within the AMT toolbox (v.1.0) for MATLAB (Majdak et al., 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate EFR responses, we used the Verhulst et al model (version 1.2) of the auditory periphery (Vecchi & Verhulst, 2019;Verhulst et al, 2018) whose EFR output has been previously compared with responses recorded in human subjects (Vasilkov et al, 2021;Verhulst et al, 2018). Combining a bandpass filter in the middle ear with an elegant transmission-line model in its inner ear, the Verhulst et al model effectively describes many facets of human cochlear mechanics including its frequency and intensity sensitivities (Vecchi et al, 2022;Vecchi & Verhulst, 2019;Verhulst et al, 2018). Subsequent transduction and propagation of this signal along parallel frequency channels in the auditory periphery are achieved using biophysically realistic processes, leading to its broad capture of physiological behaviour in the auditory nerve (AN), cochlear nucleus (CN), and inferior colliculus (IC) at both a single-unit and population level.…”
Section: Efr Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditory models (or model suites) have been developed to approximate auditory transduction (Osses et al 2022). They serve two purposes: to embody knowledge accrued about the peripheral auditory system (and test it), and to generate patterns of auditorynerve discharge for simulation of downstream processes within the brainstem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toolbox is mainly intended as an add-on to existing auditory model toolboxes (e.g. Osses et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%