2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3008176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Inversion Optimization Algorithms for Underground Metal Target Detection

Abstract: Underground metal target detection refers to estimating the properties of underground metal targets based on a set of observed data. Electromagnetic induction (EMI) method and the least-squares inversion provide the data acquisition method and the parameter estimation method for the detection, respectively. As an important part of least-squares inversion, optimization algorithms directly affect the efficiency of the least-squares inversion. To improve the efficiency of underground metal target detection, it is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The least-squares inversion is used to estimate the attributes of underground metal targets by minimizing the objective function. The objective function measures the misfit between observed values and the fitted values provided by a forward model (Wan et al, 2020), and it is minimized by the optimization algorithms.…”
Section: The Inversion Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The least-squares inversion is used to estimate the attributes of underground metal targets by minimizing the objective function. The objective function measures the misfit between observed values and the fitted values provided by a forward model (Wan et al, 2020), and it is minimized by the optimization algorithms.…”
Section: The Inversion Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodi and Mackie (2001) used the nonlinear conjugate gradient method to solve the magnetotelluric 2-D inversion problem. Wan et al (2020) used the numerical optimization algorithms to acquire the least-squares solution to identify the underground metal targets. As for the classification problems, Kappler and Gasperikova (2011) utilized the features extracted from the polarizabilities curve and Bayesian classification algorithm to classify unexploded ordnance and harmless scrap metal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus to estimate trueα^$$ \hat{\alpha} $$, we use a common numerical optimization method called Broyden‐Fletcher‐Goldfarb‐Shanno (BFGS), see Fletcher 16 . This optimization method and versions of it are widely used in many research areas to find a local minimum of a differentiable function 17‐19 . We provide the derivatives for the log‐likelihood, lfalse(αfalse)$$ \nabla l\left(\alpha \right) $$, which given in Appendix C for reference.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This optimization method and versions of it are widely used in many research areas to find a local minimum of a differentiable function. 17 , 18 , 19 We provide the derivatives for the log‐likelihood, , which given in Appendix C for reference. Due to the logarithms within the gradient function, the iterative optimization algorithms are prone to exploding gradients.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U NDERGROUND metal target detection is the process of estimating the properties of subsurface metal items based on the observed data. It has been widely applied in resource exploration [1], engineering construction [2], military fields [3], and many other fields [4]- [6]. Geophysical exploration systems such as infrared remote sensing (RS) system [7], [8], electromagnetic induction (EMI) system [9]- [12] and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) [2], [13], [14] have proven to be successful in underground target detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%