2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of isothermal and thermomechanical fatigue on type 316L(N) austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar behaviour was shown in [28]. Also, the higher stress level observed in the TMF tests could be ascribed to the higher flow stress of the material generated at the low temperature of the TMF cycle.…”
Section: Experimental Lcf-tmf Results Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar behaviour was shown in [28]. Also, the higher stress level observed in the TMF tests could be ascribed to the higher flow stress of the material generated at the low temperature of the TMF cycle.…”
Section: Experimental Lcf-tmf Results Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Damage mechanisms that play a role are, amongst others, creep, fatigue, erosion and corrosion. The reader is referred to [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] for more information on the link between power plant cycling and component damage accumulation.…”
Section: A Start-up Cost Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work has shown that the relationship of TMF and isothermal fatigue life is not straightforward [6][7][8][9] . Factors such as creep, oxidation and dynamic strain aging have a complex interplay with cycling temperatures.…”
Section: Isothermal Fatigue Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%