2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03257-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of methods for porosity determination of cellulose based porous materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underestimation or overestimation shows the importance of the appropriate selection of the method and its parameters for the given research material. According to Hossen et al [158], saturation methods (here saturation with silicon oil) are less complicated and cheaper for low-density materials like foams fluid than mercury porosimetry, while geometric method, SEM and BJH sorption methods can give, in this case, deviated results from expected ones. Studies by Ghasemi-Mobarakeh et al [146] showed that surface layers of nanofiber materials should not be analyzed by mercury porosimetry or density measurements, due to the possible influence of high pressure.…”
Section: Methods Used To Assess Porosity In Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underestimation or overestimation shows the importance of the appropriate selection of the method and its parameters for the given research material. According to Hossen et al [158], saturation methods (here saturation with silicon oil) are less complicated and cheaper for low-density materials like foams fluid than mercury porosimetry, while geometric method, SEM and BJH sorption methods can give, in this case, deviated results from expected ones. Studies by Ghasemi-Mobarakeh et al [146] showed that surface layers of nanofiber materials should not be analyzed by mercury porosimetry or density measurements, due to the possible influence of high pressure.…”
Section: Methods Used To Assess Porosity In Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ investigations of phase transformations of powder mixtures during heating and cooling by XRD. uncertainty for materials with high porosity [63], the porosity data presented here are still effective for a qualitative and in particular a relative assessment of the different samples. CF-900 possesses the highest porosity and contains the smallest grains among all the samples, as can be seen in Table 2 and Fig.…”
Section: Microstructural Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The density from the silicon oil test depends on the oil penetrating into the pores. Recently, Hossen et al 33 discuss various methods to characterize the porosity of cellulose nanomaterial structures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%