2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0783-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of methods for testing the equality of two or more ROC curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ROC curves can be applied to unbalanced tasks and without knowing a priori the false positive and false negative costs [48]. The AUC metric was first studied for the binary classification task, but later it showed its potential also for the multiclass classification [49, 50]. In this work, following the research of [50], the AUC reported is the average value obtained on single pairwise ROC curve for each of the 10‐fold experiments for the prediction of the unknown tagt$$ {tag}_t $$.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROC curves can be applied to unbalanced tasks and without knowing a priori the false positive and false negative costs [48]. The AUC metric was first studied for the binary classification task, but later it showed its potential also for the multiclass classification [49, 50]. In this work, following the research of [50], the AUC reported is the average value obtained on single pairwise ROC curve for each of the 10‐fold experiments for the prediction of the unknown tagt$$ {tag}_t $$.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methodologies discussed in the literature for making that sort of comparisons (for a review of such methodologies, see Fanjul-Hevia and González-Manteiga, 2018), although most of them do not consider the possible effect that the presence of covariates can have in the performance of the test. In the example provided, apart from the diagnostic variables there are other covariates such as the age or the neuron-specific enolase of the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%