A comparative study of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device acceptance between primiparous and multiparous women in a tertiary care centre

Kharkwal, Sushila; Sharma, Swati; Manisha, Kumari

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162116

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar results found in study conducted by Kharkwal S et al, acceptance was more in multigravida (57.86%) compared to primigravida. 16 Similar result also found in study done by Safwat et al, in Egypt. 17 Mostly multigravida completed their family, and want family planning.…”

Section: Acceptabilitysupporting

confidence: 85%

A prospective study of acceptability, safety and demographic profile for post placental intrauterine contraceptive device

Jain¹,

Choudhari²

2020

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The objective of this study was to study the acceptance rate, safety, demographic profile and complication of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD).Methods: Study was prospective, interventional study, held in department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at authors tertiary care centre. Number of participants was 280. Counselling about family planning was done in antenatal OPD and indoor ward. Total duration of study was 18 months. Selection of participants done based on selection criteria. Participants who accepted postplacental intrauterine contraceptive device as method of contraception followed up to 6 weeks postnatal for complication related to PPIUCD.Results: Authors noted that acceptance rate of PPIUCD was 13.6% and main reason for acceptance was its long acting reversible nature and main reason for denial was ‘do not want contraception immediately’. In present study there was statistically significant association between parity and birth order. However, literacy, urban locality and employment had positive influence over acceptance. If good technique of insertion will be used than expulsion rate will also reduce as seen in present study i.e. expulsion rate only 2.6 %.Conclusions: Post placental intrauterine contraceptive device is one of the best long acting reversible contraceptive methods. It does not affect breast milk production. Woman does not need extra visit to clinic for contraception and she is ensured that she has adequate contraception before getting discharge from hospital. PPIUCD provide adequate birth spacing between two children which reduces maternal and child morbidity.

show abstract

Section: Acceptabilitysupporting

confidence: 85%

A prospective study of acceptability, safety and demographic profile for post placental intrauterine contraceptive device

Jain¹,

Choudhari²

2020

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 Kharkwal S et al conducted study in MLB medical college, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India where it was found that 42.15% had postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device in primipara. 5 Maluchuru S et al found in the study conducted at Guntur Medical College Hospital where the PPIUCD acceptance with one child was 31.5%. 6 The most common reasons behind the acceptance of Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device was PPFP counselling day by day by RMNCH and doctors to make the women for willing to accept Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device and awareness of paturients in primiparaous and frequent review meetings conducted to medical officers by both district and state authorities.…”

Section: Acceptancementioning

confidence: 95%

A cross sectional study on willingness and acceptabily: PPIUCD by primipara mothers at a tertiary care hospital, Tamil Nadu

Gunasingh

Meena

Mothilal

2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device is a postpartum family planning method which provides spacing to the next pregnancy and also it helps to avoid unwanted / unintended pregnancy during postpartum period. Our aim was to study the willingness and acceptability of Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device among primi paraous women and compare them as a factor of route of insertion (vaginal versus caesarean).Methods: A cross sectional analytical study was done in a tertiary care teaching institution to know the willingness and acceptance among primi paraous delivery (either vaginal and caesarean deliveries) for the period of three months using the hospital records that a total number of 587 primi paraous deliveries and among them 433 mothers had Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device over the three months period, were taken as a secondary data and studied for their willingness and acceptance for Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device.Results: 82.8 % of primi paraous women were showing willingness for Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device and 73.8 % of them had Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions were more in caesarean deliveries than in vaginal deliveries of mothers with one child.Conclusions: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device is a strong weapon in the family planning and should be encouraged in both vaginal and caesarean deliveries. The acceptability of Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device in women with one child was effective and statistically significant at p value is < 0.05.

show abstract

A comparative study of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device acceptance between primiparous and multiparous women in a tertiary care centre

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

A prospective study of acceptability, safety and demographic profile for post placental intrauterine contraceptive device

A prospective study of acceptability, safety and demographic profile for post placental intrauterine contraceptive device

A cross sectional study on willingness and acceptabily: PPIUCD by primipara mothers at a tertiary care hospital, Tamil Nadu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About