2002
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2001.1451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Structural Dynamic Modification and Sensitivity Method Approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bridge Health Monitoring process, the results of dynamic tests are generally applied for (Figure 2): -identification of loads − assessment of the magnitude as well as the spatial and temporal distribution of forces acting on a structure, [3,5,7,16,22,25] -structural system identification, typically based on dynamic parameters [2,4,6,13,17,25] and focused on structure stiffness, boundary conditions, integrity and so on, -identification of overloading [13,21,25] by abnormal heavy vehicles, caused by collisions, blast loadings and so on, -detection and identification of defects by means of analysis of changes of the bridge dynamic parameters, [1,11,14,19] -updating of numerical model of the structure on the basis of experimental data, [9,13,[17][18]25] -identification of fatigue process based on analysis of stress spectrum in structural elements of the bridge. [9,20] Generally, the results of bridge dynamic tests create background for assessment of bridge structural condition and for the prediction of the remaining service life of the structure.…”
Section: Figure 2 Classification Of Dynamic Tests Of Bridge Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bridge Health Monitoring process, the results of dynamic tests are generally applied for (Figure 2): -identification of loads − assessment of the magnitude as well as the spatial and temporal distribution of forces acting on a structure, [3,5,7,16,22,25] -structural system identification, typically based on dynamic parameters [2,4,6,13,17,25] and focused on structure stiffness, boundary conditions, integrity and so on, -identification of overloading [13,21,25] by abnormal heavy vehicles, caused by collisions, blast loadings and so on, -detection and identification of defects by means of analysis of changes of the bridge dynamic parameters, [1,11,14,19] -updating of numerical model of the structure on the basis of experimental data, [9,13,[17][18]25] -identification of fatigue process based on analysis of stress spectrum in structural elements of the bridge. [9,20] Generally, the results of bridge dynamic tests create background for assessment of bridge structural condition and for the prediction of the remaining service life of the structure.…”
Section: Figure 2 Classification Of Dynamic Tests Of Bridge Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a minimal change is required in the magnitude of the mass [10,11] in order to ensure minimum frequency deviation and avoid uncertainties in the identification of modal analysis [12,13]. Moreover, the change of mass should not be too high in order to minimize the difference between the modified and unmodified modes of vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With linear structures, approximation techniques typically utilize a first-order Taylor series approximation or structural dynamics modification theory [1]. In this paper, we propose to utilize principal component analysis of the response data, coupled with a neural network for interpolating across the parameter space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%