2020 21st International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/epe51172.2020.9269194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of synchronverter stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there is only one coupling from virtual excitation to the stator in the model, that emulates emf. Thus v d,synch = 0 and v q,synch = ω r ψ f , where ω r is virtual angular velocity and ψ f is virtual excitation flux [23]. Hence, the modulation signals for synchronverter in eq.…”
Section: A Statcom Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, there is only one coupling from virtual excitation to the stator in the model, that emulates emf. Thus v d,synch = 0 and v q,synch = ω r ψ f , where ω r is virtual angular velocity and ψ f is virtual excitation flux [23]. Hence, the modulation signals for synchronverter in eq.…”
Section: A Statcom Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In synchronverter voltage or reactive power injection in PCC is controlled using excitation flux ψ f [23]. In this case, the authors assumed the former for STATCOM.…”
Section: A Statcom Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%