A Comparative Study of the Responses of Young Normal Children and Older Retarded Children in Hypothetical Temptation to Steal Situations

Jackson, Merrill; Haines, Allan

doi:10.3109/13668258209018830

Cited by 4 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mahaney and Stephens (1974) reported that children and adolescents with ID make progress through the developmental stages of moral reasoning, but this progress may not be as marked or as consistent as that which occurs amongst their peers without ID. Overall, the studies suggest that adults with ID are reasoning at a developmentally earlier moral stage when compared to their peers (Bender, 1980;Blakey, 1973;Foye & Simeonsson, 1979;Gargiulo, 1984;Jackson & Haines, 1982;Kahn, 1976Kahn, , 1983Lind & Smith, 1984;Taylor & Achenbach, 1975).…”

Section: Intellectual Disabilities Moral Reasoning Theory and Behavmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Notwithstanding the major theoretical and empirical limitations, the literature indicates overwhelmingly that the moral development of people with ID lags behind that of age-matched peers without ID (Bender, 1980;Blakey, 1973;Foye & Simeonsson, 1979;Gargiulo, 1984;Jackson & Haines, 1982;Kahn, 1976Kahn, , 1983Lind & Smith, 1984;Taylor & Achenbach, 1975). Most often, the moral reasoning of participants with ID matches that of typically developing younger participants, indicating a relationship with intellectual functioning.…”

Section: Intellectual Disabilities Moral Reasoning Theory and Behavmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Moral reasoning theory and illegal behaviour by adults with intellectual disabilities

Langdon

Clare

Murphy

2011

Psychology, Crime & Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many studies conclude there is a strong relationship between moral reasoning and illegal behaviour amongst young offenders. However, there has been no research examining this relationship amongst people with intellectual disabilities. There is some empirical evidence to suggest that the relationship between moral reasoning and illegal behaviour may be curvilinear, such that lower moral reasoning and higher moral reasoning relates to lower rates of illegal behaviour and inappropriate conduct. Given this, and evidence that people with intellectual disabilities are reasoning at a lower moral stage than their same-age peers, it is proposed that some people with intellectual disabilities may actually be less likely to engage in illegal behaviour because they are reasoning at an earlier moral stage, while those with 'borderline' intelligence would be more likely to engage in illegal behaviour. This suggests that the relationship between moral reasoning and illegal behaviour is moderated by intelligence, and this has implications for the design of intervention programmes for people with intellectual disabilities, but further research is needed.

show abstract

Section: Intellectual Disabilities Moral Reasoning Theory and Behavmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Intellectual Disabilities Moral Reasoning Theory and Behavmentioning

confidence: 97%

Moral reasoning theory and illegal behaviour by adults with intellectual disabilities

Langdon

Clare

Murphy

2011

Psychology, Crime & Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Jackson and Haines (1982) reported no difference between younger typically developing children and older children with IDs with respect to their report of what they "should do".…”

Section: Other Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While acknowledging their limitations in terms of the validity of their assessments, Moral Development 23 Jackson & Haines (1982) considered that the children's accounts were related to their moral judgements, suggesting the groups were similar with respect to their moral reasoning, or moral judgement…”

Section: Other Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first made use of a cross-sectional group comparative methodology, where participants matched for 'mental age' completed the Jackson Hypothetical Temptation to Steal Test. In this task, participants were read a story about being tempted to steal and then asked what they think they would and should do in that situation (Jackson & Haines, 1982). The "should" statement was meant to elicit what a participant believed is morally right in the situation.…”

Section: Other Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Developing an understanding of the literature relating to the moral development of people with intellectual disabilities

Langdon

Clare

Murphy

2010

Developmental Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The moral reasoning abilities of men and women with intellectual disabilities who have a history of criminal offending behaviour

McDermott

Langdon

2014

Legal Criminol Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(2015) The moral reasoning abilities of men and women with intellectual disabilities who have a history of criminal offending behaviour. Legal AbstractPurpose. The current study had the following two aims (a) to examine the moral reasoning abilities of four groups of people: (i) men and women with IDs who had a documented history of criminal offending, and (ii) men and women with IDs and no such history, and (b) to examine the relationship between emotional and behavioural problems and moral reasoning. It was predicted that (a) there would be no significant difference between the moral reasoning of men and women with IDs, (b) men and women with IDs who are not offenders will have "developmentally immature" moral reasoning in comparison to offenders, and (c) moral reasoning will significantly predict emotional and behavioural problems. Methods. Sixty-eight men and women with mild intellectual disabilities (IDs) with and without a history of criminal offending were recruited and asked to complete measures of intelligence, moral reasoning, and emotional/behavioural problems.Results. As predicted, men and women did not have different moral reasoning, but offenders did have "developmentally more mature" moral reasoning than nonoffenders. Women had higher levels of physical and verbal aggression, while offenders, generally, had higher levels of psychopathology. Women with a history of criminal offending had higher levels of sexually inappropriate behaviour compared to men and women in the community. Moral reasoning significantly predicted emotional and behavioural problems. Conclusions. Further work in this area is needed, and interventions that aim to address a moral developmental "delay" may be beneficial in reducing recidivism amongst this population.Running head: MORAL REASONING

show abstract

A Comparative Study of the Responses of Young Normal Children and Older Retarded Children in Hypothetical Temptation to Steal Situations

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

Moral reasoning theory and illegal behaviour by adults with intellectual disabilities

Moral reasoning theory and illegal behaviour by adults with intellectual disabilities

Developing an understanding of the literature relating to the moral development of people with intellectual disabilities

The moral reasoning abilities of men and women with intellectual disabilities who have a history of criminal offending behaviour

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About