2002
DOI: 10.1086/338318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of the Absolute Magnitude Distributions of Supernovae

Abstract: The Asiago Supernova Catalog is used to carry out a comparative study of supernova absolute-magnitude distributions. An overview of the absolute magnitudes of the supernovae in the current observational sample is presented, and the evidence for subluminous and overluminous events is examined. The fraction of supernovae that are underluminous (M B > −15) appears to be higher (perhaps much higher) than one fifth but it remains very uncertain. The fraction that are overluminous (M B < −20) is lower (probably much… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
301
2
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
15
301
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We note, however, that the uncertainty in the relative fractions within the corecollapse types is quite large. For instance, Smartt et al (2009) found a much higher fraction of type Ib/c (29%) than Richardson et al (2002), while their estimate of the number of type IIL is about a factor 10 lower than what has been assumed here. Clearly, significantly larger data-sets are needed to determine the CC rates accurately, both at low and high redshifts.…”
Section: Supernova Subtypescontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…We note, however, that the uncertainty in the relative fractions within the corecollapse types is quite large. For instance, Smartt et al (2009) found a much higher fraction of type Ib/c (29%) than Richardson et al (2002), while their estimate of the number of type IIL is about a factor 10 lower than what has been assumed here. Clearly, significantly larger data-sets are needed to determine the CC rates accurately, both at low and high redshifts.…”
Section: Supernova Subtypescontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…This value corresponds roughly to the limiting magnitude of SN surveys, especially the LOSS SN Survey (van den Bergh et al 2005) providing a large 1 The R 25 radius is the radius of the 25 mag arcsec −2 B-band isophote. (and long-dashed) lines show the average magnitude (and its dispersion) given in Richardson et al (2002). Almost no SN are found in the shaded area (apparent magnitudes fainter than 19) because it corresponds roughly to the limiting magnitude of the sample (see text).…”
Section: The Supernova Samplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most luminous SLSNe observed have M V ∼ −22.5 (Gal-Yam 2012). In contrast, regular supernovae typically peak in the range −17 < M V < −20 (Richardson et al 2002).…”
Section: Superluminous Supernovaementioning
confidence: 99%