2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-010-9604-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the seroprevalence of brucellosis in commercial and small-scale mixed dairy–beef cattle enterprises of Lusaka province and Chibombo district, Zambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
28
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the seroprevalence was independent of sex, it decreased with increasing age. On the contrary, Chimana et al, (2010) reported more seropositive cases in bulls (12.5%) when compared to females (8.1%). The relationship between sex distribution and brucella infection has been seen to vary with different cattle populations.…”
Section: Effect Of Sex Distribution On Brucella Infection In Cattlementioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the seroprevalence was independent of sex, it decreased with increasing age. On the contrary, Chimana et al, (2010) reported more seropositive cases in bulls (12.5%) when compared to females (8.1%). The relationship between sex distribution and brucella infection has been seen to vary with different cattle populations.…”
Section: Effect Of Sex Distribution On Brucella Infection In Cattlementioning
confidence: 81%
“…The vulnerability is more pronounced with dairy production units which have developed around rapidly growing urban centres. The disease is present throughout the African continent (Chimana et al, 2010;Matope et al 2011;Megersa et al, 2011) and has also been reported in two of Cameroon's neighboring countries, Nigeria and Chad (Bertu et al, 2011;Schelling et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The observed brucellosis seroprevalence results agree with those of previous studies in Zimbabwe (Madsen, 1989;Mohan et al 1996) and those from smallholder farming areas in other regions (Bayemi et al 2009;Ibrahim et al 2010;Karimuribo et al 2007). However, higher brucellosis seroprevalence have been recorded in individual cattle from traditional smallholder herds in other areas (Chimana et al 2010;Faye et al 2005;Muma et al 2006). The differences in seroprevalence is likely to be attributed to certain risk factors such as cattle management practices, population dynamics; and biological features, for instance herd immunity that largely influence the epidemiology of Brucella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have also been reported elsewhere (Bayemi et al 2009). However, this relationship has been shown to vary with different cattle subpopulations (Chimana et al 2010;Kubuafor et al 2000;Muma et al 2006). The preponderance of seropositive reactors in the 2 -4 years age group may be related to the onset of sexual maturity, which is associated with increased risk of infection with Brucella spp., especially following abortions (Muma et al 2007a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological tests are relatively easy to perform and provide a practical advantage in detecting the prevalence of Brucella infection (Abubakar et al, 2011). The use of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to identify Brucella DNA at genus, species and even biovar levels has becoming extended to improve diagnostic tests (Poester et al, 2010;Chimana et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%