A comparative study on dynamic stiffness in typical finite element model and multi‐body model of C6–C7 cervical spine segment

Abstract

In contrast to numerous researches on static or quasi-static stiffness of cervical spine segments, very few investigations on their dynamic stiffness were published. Currently, scale factors and estimated coefficients were usually used in multi-body models for including viscoelastic properties and damping effects, meanwhile viscoelastic properties of some tissues were unavailable for establishing finite element models. Because dynamic stiffness of cervical spine segments in these models were difficult to validate because of lacking in experimental data, we tried to gain some insights on current modeling methods through studying dynamic stiffness differences between these models. A finite element model and a multi-body model of C6-C7 segment were developed through using available material data and typical modeling technologies. These two models were validated with quasi-static response data of the C6-C7 cervical spine segment. Dynamic stiffness differences were investigated through controlling motions of C6 vertebrae at different rates and then comparing their reaction forces or moments. Validation results showed that both the finite element model and the multi-body model could generate reasonable responses under quasi-static loads, but the finite element segment model exhibited more nonlinear characters. Dynamic response investigations indicated that dynamic stiffness of this finite element model might be underestimated because of the absence of dynamic stiffen effect and damping effects of annulus fibrous, while representation of these effects also need to be improved in current multi-body model. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Associations between Obesity and Spinal Diseases: A Medical Expenditure Panel Study Analysis

“…Our study did not find significant correlation between obesity and cervical diseases, which was also consistent with findings of prior studies [34,55,56,57,58]. This could possibly be explained by the fact that cervical segment need not bear as much bodyweight as the lower segments such lumbar segments [59,60], while it is also possible that the small sample size of cervical diseases (as seen even in our large-sample study) does not provide enough power to detect any significant association in most research samples. Using STATA’s module of powerlog [61], our power analysis shows that a sample size of 213,081 is needed to detect the significant pattern between spondylosis and overweight status.…”

Effects of cervical rotatory manipulation on the cervical spinal cord complex with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the vertebral canal: A finite element study

“…In 1973, Belyschko et al applied the FE technique to analyze the biomechanical properties of the spine and developed the first FE model of the spine (Belytschko et al, 1973). Subsequently, many researchers developed their own FE models of the cervical spine and studied the biomechanical properties of the extraspinal structures such as the cervical vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs and ligaments (Brolin and Halldin, 2004;Womack et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2016). In these studies, the findings contributed to a more accurate FE model of the cervical spine but did not involve vertebral canal contents.…”

Human body modeling method to simulate the biodynamic characteristics of spine in vivo with different sitting postures

“…Many investigations used FE models, lumped parameters or multibody models, and artificial neural network models to study biodynamic characteristics of the human spine. Kitazaki and Griffin proposed a FE model of the entire human spine to perform a modal analysis.…”