A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling

Abstract

Traditionally, two approaches have been employed for structural equation modeling: covariance structure analysis and partial least squares. A third alternative, generalized structured component analysis, was introduced recently in the psychometric literature. The authors conduct a simulation study to evaluate the relative performance of these three approaches in terms of parameter recovery under different experimental conditions of sample size, data distribution, and model specification. In this study, model specification is the only meaningful condition in differentiating the performance of the three approaches in parameter recovery. Specifically, when the model is correctly specified, covariance structure analysis tends to recover parameters better than the other two approaches. Conversely, when the model is misspecified, generalized structured component analysis tends to recover parameters better. Finally, partial least squares exhibits inferior performance in parameter recovery compared with the other approaches. In particular, this tendency is salient when the model involves cross-loadings. Thus, generalized structured component analysis may be a good alternative to partial least squares for structural equation modeling and is recommended over covariance structure analysis unless correct model specification is ensured.

Innovation Strategy to Improve the Competitiveness of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises of Bandar Lampung Banana Chips

“…According to Chin (1998), the best thing about this method was it was able to test a complex research that contained a lot of variables simultaneously. Hwang et al (2010) also explained that the structural equation modeling method could complete analysis with one estimation while others could complete it with some regression equations. In the structural equation modeling method, the constructed validity and reliability was tested by identifying the model and evaluating the construction.…”

The Determinants of Tourism Destination Competitiveness (TDC): PLSPath Model of Structural Equation Modeling

“…Partial Least Square (PLS) path modeling of the SEM was used because it best when; sample size is small, applications have little available theory, predictive accuracy is paramount, correct model specification cannot be ensured and when there is non-normal distributional assumption of the data [25][26][27].…”

Introducing an Optimal (and a Simpler) Approach to Partial Least Squares Analyses

“…When SEM is not applicable for the reasons cited above, PLS is a convenient tool that provides reliable conclusions (Hwang et al, 2010) [21].…”