A Comparative Study on Performance of Public and Private Telecommunication Sectors with Reference to Wireless Services in Assam Circle

Abstract

Indian Telecom Sector is one of the fastest growing domains compared to other sectors of development, which has received extensive investments, both by government as well as private players in the recent years. The prime purpose of this study was to compare the performance of Public and Private Telecommunication sector with reference to wireless services in Assam Telecom Circle. The paper tried to explore and understand the major similarities and differences existing between the public and private cellular service providers in terms of market penetration effectiveness, their subscribers' base, revenue earned by them etc. in the above mentioned Circle. National and State level data of Telecom Sector was collected on a periodic basis over time. A critical evaluation had been done with the help of Applied Analytical Research, by using facts and information already available. The result showed that there were few common factors applicable to both Public and Private Telecom Sector; however significant differences in performance are there in these sectors in Assam Circle. The key findings from this study describe that visibly the Private Sector had better performance than Public Sector in terms of few parameters considered in this study, which might indicate a possible development direction for the effectiveness of Public Sector in this Circle.

Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of hexaaquanickel(II) bis(4-hydroxybenzoate) dihydrate

“…Researchers from this institute synthesized and structurally characterized supramolecular complexes analogous to compound 1 with magnesium(II) (MGHBZA20; Shnulin et al, 1981), cobalt(II) (MGHBZB20; Shnulin et al, 1981) and manganese(II) (COLWUV; Shnulin et al, 1984), which are all isostructural with the title compound. In addition, the structure of the magnesium(II) complex (AYOJOP; Baruah, 2016) is isomorphic with that of compound 1. The precision of the previous structure determinations of these compounds were not nearly as high as that of the structure reported here (Rfactors of 0.07 or more compared to 0.03) while the intermolecular interactions have not yet been assessed quantitatively.…”

Zn and Ni complexes of pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylates: crystal field stabilization matters!

“…We here also mention two dissenting Compilation of the structural characterizations performed in the context of this work and of previous literature. References: 1: Hå kansson et al (1993); Okabe & Oya (2000); 2: Gaw et al (1971); Villa et al (1972); Quaglieri et al (1972); Nathan & Mai (2000); Moghimi et al (2002); Zhong et al (2004); Sanotra et al (2012); Baruah (2016); Mirzaei (2016); 4: Zhou et al (2006); Gao et al (2006); 6: Cui et al (2006); Aghabozorg et al (2007); Fronczek (2015).…”