2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on slurry and dry erosion behaviour of HVOF sprayed WC–CoCr coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite both investigations [14,15] seeking to evaluate the erosion performance of hard cermet coatings, there is little published research contrasting the two test regimes, slurry and dry erosion, on analogous surfaces. One such investigation by Thakur and Arora [19] examined the erosion of WC coatings under pot-type slurry impingement and dry jet erosion. The investigation [19] concluded that cermet coatings were highly erosion resistant when compared with the uncoated substrate and that dry jet erosion brought about substantially greater erosion rates over slurry erosion.…”
Section: K Ke Ey Yw Wo or Rd Ds Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite both investigations [14,15] seeking to evaluate the erosion performance of hard cermet coatings, there is little published research contrasting the two test regimes, slurry and dry erosion, on analogous surfaces. One such investigation by Thakur and Arora [19] examined the erosion of WC coatings under pot-type slurry impingement and dry jet erosion. The investigation [19] concluded that cermet coatings were highly erosion resistant when compared with the uncoated substrate and that dry jet erosion brought about substantially greater erosion rates over slurry erosion.…”
Section: K Ke Ey Yw Wo or Rd Ds Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such investigation by Thakur and Arora [19] examined the erosion of WC coatings under pot-type slurry impingement and dry jet erosion. The investigation [19] concluded that cermet coatings were highly erosion resistant when compared with the uncoated substrate and that dry jet erosion brought about substantially greater erosion rates over slurry erosion. This was attributed to all impinging particles striking the specimen at 90 O , and to increased particle velocity as compared with pot-type slurry erosion.…”
Section: K Ke Ey Yw Wo or Rd Ds Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a and 4a. However, for a given increase in speed, increase in wear rate was found to be less and it may be due to the fact that at higher speeds erodent particle motion was highly random and led to severe inter-particle collisions which caused decrease in the momentum of erodent particles leading to decrease in mass loss at higher speeds [19][20][21][22]. For the same 180 min test run, mass loss is more for 45 wt.% concentration as compared to 25 wt.% concentration.…”
Section: Slurry Erosion Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there have been numerous studies examining the effect of carbide size on the wear performance of HVOF deposited coatings [12,26,32,33], the outcomes of which demonstrate the increase in wear rate with increasing carbide size. The presence of larger carbides causes increased damage to the underlying surfaces with WC-CoCr experiencing low wear due to the coatings comparably small carbide size [12] and high hardness [34].…”
Section: I In Nt Tr Ro Od Du Uc Ct Ti Io On Nmentioning
confidence: 99%