2021 Mohammad Ali Jinnah University International Conference on Computing (MAJICC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/majicc53071.2021.9526266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Survey of LiDAR-SLAM and LiDAR based Sensor Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies have suggested robotic explorer solutions. In addition, many academic and industrial works have provided successful theories, methods, algorithms, and hardware to solve the complexities of exploring deep wells and caves [1][2][3]. Unfortunately, all these solutions have a relatively high cost that might not be accessible for local populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior studies have suggested robotic explorer solutions. In addition, many academic and industrial works have provided successful theories, methods, algorithms, and hardware to solve the complexities of exploring deep wells and caves [1][2][3]. Unfortunately, all these solutions have a relatively high cost that might not be accessible for local populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors of [14,15] demonstrated the applicability and efficiency of robotic exploratory capabilities in complex environments by using a LiDAR-based system that has been used on simulated and real environments. Authors of [3] provided a competitive survey on LiDAR-SLAM based sensor technologies. Their results showed remarkable challenges in using the LiDAR-SLAM system, which were: 1) LiDAR could not provide accurate localization due to a lack of precision; 2) LiDAR suffered from time complexity in performing and computing the gathered data; 3) the accuracy of location was more accurate in 3D than 2D and 4) LiDAR could not easily identify one specific object out of a group of objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nie et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2022). Additionally, the localization accuracy from SLAM (Simultaneous Localization And Mapping) (Bai et al, 2021(Bai et al, , 2022Grisetti et al, 2007;Hess et al, 2016;Khan et al, 2021;Nubert et al, 2022;Van Nam and Gon-Woo, 2021) is not high enough for precise parking in MMPA. Matching the 2D template marker's images from the teaching and automation stages (Meng et al, 2021) could provide a relative 3D pose for parking error compensation but can only be used to move the robot base on a 2D plane rather than a 3D surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLAM based on all kinds of laser radar is not within the scope of discussion in this paper. Interested readers can refer to [6][7][8] and other sources in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%