1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9473(98)00067-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between neural networks and chaotic models for exchange rate prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They took daily data from 17 October 1994 to 18 may 2000 for insample estimation and from 19 May 2000 to 3 July 2001 for outof-sample forecasting of EUP/USD exchange rates which clearly showed that NNR models confirm the potential of accurate forecasting. Lisi et al [7] have compared the performance of neural networks and chaotic models over common data sets and variables. It is an attempt to verify whether they can predict better under the same experimental condition.…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They took daily data from 17 October 1994 to 18 may 2000 for insample estimation and from 19 May 2000 to 3 July 2001 for outof-sample forecasting of EUP/USD exchange rates which clearly showed that NNR models confirm the potential of accurate forecasting. Lisi et al [7] have compared the performance of neural networks and chaotic models over common data sets and variables. It is an attempt to verify whether they can predict better under the same experimental condition.…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then Random Walk model was formulated. From practical and theoretical standpoints [7] the suitability of this model was criticized. A number of studies indicate that various techniques have been applied to predict the FOREX rate and estimate its volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These architectures include: multilayer perceptron (MLP) (Lisi and Schiavo, 1999;Faraway and Chatfield, 1998;Stern, 1996;Hill et al, 1996;Lachtermacher and Fuller, 1995;Jayawardena and Fernando, 1995); recurrent networks (Freeman, 1994, section 6.2); radial basis functions (RBF) Hutchinson, 1994); comparison of MLP and RBF Jayawardena et al, 1996).…”
Section: Feed-forward Neural Network Models In Time Series Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lisi and Schiavo (1999) used a FFNN model for predicting European exchange rates. The FFNN model was found to perform as well as the best model, which was a chaos model.…”
Section: Feed-forward Neural Network Models In Time Series Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation