2011
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2011.2123857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between the GPI and PID Controllers for the Stabilization of a DC–DC “Buck” Converter: A Field Programmable Gate Array Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are detailed as follows: (a) development a real hovercraft laboratory prototype and (b) synthesization of the proposed robust controller in a real platform. In this case, several algorithms based on the GPI philosophy have been carried out in electronic applications such as the control of Buck converters (Zurita-Bustamante et al, 2011) or the control of single-phase multilevel cascade inverters (Juárez-Abad et al, 2014). Taking into consideration the slow dynamics of the hovercraft vessel model in comparison with the electronic applications described above, the synthesization of the robust controller designed on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) (Juárez-Abad et al, 2014;Morales et al, 2014aMorales et al, , 2013Zurita-Bustamante et al, 2011) or low-cost architectures based on reconfigurable logic (Morales et al, 2014b) does not present any problem regarding computation time requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are detailed as follows: (a) development a real hovercraft laboratory prototype and (b) synthesization of the proposed robust controller in a real platform. In this case, several algorithms based on the GPI philosophy have been carried out in electronic applications such as the control of Buck converters (Zurita-Bustamante et al, 2011) or the control of single-phase multilevel cascade inverters (Juárez-Abad et al, 2014). Taking into consideration the slow dynamics of the hovercraft vessel model in comparison with the electronic applications described above, the synthesization of the robust controller designed on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) (Juárez-Abad et al, 2014;Morales et al, 2014aMorales et al, , 2013Zurita-Bustamante et al, 2011) or low-cost architectures based on reconfigurable logic (Morales et al, 2014b) does not present any problem regarding computation time requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we consider a corresponding feed-forward approach to compensate for disturbances, we can improve the performance of closed-loop systems. Note that a GPI observer can estimate unknown time-varying disturbances [37], [38]. To achieve a good performance in speed command tracking and disturbance rejection, we introduce the GPI observer technique for the PMSM servo system.…”
Section: A Design Of a Gpi Observermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn the DC output voltage can be fed into DC motors, as for instance in the case of actuators, mechatronic devices and pumps [1][2][3]. Nonlinear control approaches for DC-DC converters connected to DC motors have been presented in [4][5][6][7][8]. In particular global linearization approaches and flatness-based control of such systems have been presented in [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%