1967
DOI: 10.6028/jres.071c.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of absorbed dose determinations in graphite by cavity ionization measurements and by calorimetry

Abstract: The ab sorbed dose in graphite fro m a cobalt·60 gamma·ray source was measured with a s pheric al air·filled cavity ionization chamb er and with two s ph eri cal calorim eters. The ins trum ent s were constructed from hig h·purity graphite . The curre nt per unit mass of air and the ab sorbed pow er per unit mass of graphite were determined with un certainties of 0.40 and 0.17 perce nt respectively. Whe n the two res ults are combined the value of Walr • ~m is found to be 33.72 electron volts in graphite per i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume of uniform absorbed dose rate is about 4 cm in diameter by 4 cm high, centered at 6.5 cm above the inside bottom of the can on the central axis. The absorbed dose rate of this source has been previously determined by an adiabatic graphite spherical calorimeter and a graphite ionization chamber of identical dimensions to an overall uncertainty estimated to be about +0.4% at a 99% confidence level [3]. Periodic verification checks of the absorbed dose rate is done annually by means of reference transfer dosimeters in collaboration with the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) of the U.K.…”
Section: For 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The volume of uniform absorbed dose rate is about 4 cm in diameter by 4 cm high, centered at 6.5 cm above the inside bottom of the can on the central axis. The absorbed dose rate of this source has been previously determined by an adiabatic graphite spherical calorimeter and a graphite ionization chamber of identical dimensions to an overall uncertainty estimated to be about +0.4% at a 99% confidence level [3]. Periodic verification checks of the absorbed dose rate is done annually by means of reference transfer dosimeters in collaboration with the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) of the U.K.…”
Section: For 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorbed dose rate in water in May 1986 was 0.076 kGymin" 1 . A complete discussion is given in reference [3] of the sources of the uncertainties in the absorbed dose rate of this 60 Co facility.…”
Section: For 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17. KEY WORDS (six to twelve entries; alphabetical order; capitalize only the first letter of the first key word unless a proper name; separated by semicolons) Aluminum; carbon; depth dose; depth-dose distributions; dye-film dosimeters; polyethylene; polystyrene; radiochromic dyes; 10-MeV electrons 18. AVAILABILITY Unlimited 19.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic errors produced by gradients that are not negligible have been discussed, [1 , 2] 1 and upper limits for these errors have been assigned in some simple cases [3]. Experimental means are also available for detecting and evaluating the gradient-induced errors [4]. A calorimeter design is reported here which is intended essentially to eliminate systematic errors caused by temperature gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%