1998
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<2764:acoacd>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Amazonian Climate Data with General Circulation Model Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiation and precipitation outputs from three GCM simulations were evaluated using three years' data from a set of three Amazonian sites from the ABRACOS climate monitoring project (Culf et al 1998). The GCMs were versions designed to simulate current neotropical conditions, from the Hadley Centre (UKMO), the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the Laboratoire du Météorologie Dynamique (LMD).…”
Section: Amazonian Sitesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The radiation and precipitation outputs from three GCM simulations were evaluated using three years' data from a set of three Amazonian sites from the ABRACOS climate monitoring project (Culf et al 1998). The GCMs were versions designed to simulate current neotropical conditions, from the Hadley Centre (UKMO), the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the Laboratoire du Météorologie Dynamique (LMD).…”
Section: Amazonian Sitesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…ERA underestimates the surface sensible heat flux by as much as 50% prior to late September (the 52 nd pentad), but overestimate the increase of the sensible flux during the transition. Culf et al (1998) have shown that the ECMWF model underestimates the surface solar flux at Reserva Jaru, especially during May to August due to errors in the We use surface sensible and latent heat fluxes, precipitation, temperature, humidity, winds, and geopotential height from ERA data at 13 levels ranging from 1000 to 100 hPa. Because the peak of the rainy season varies from July in the northern areas of Amazonia to January in southern areas, we choose a smaller domain, 5 -15 S and 45 -75 W, referred to as the Southern Amazonian region (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although deep convective clouds have a strong influence on surface shortwave radiation when present, their aggregate impact is limited by a lower frequency of occurrence compared to shallow cumulus. Longwave CRE is typically a factor of 5-6 smaller than SW CRE (e.g., Culf et al, 1998;Malhi et al, 2002;Burleyson et al, 2015). This study will limit most interpretation to SW CRE.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cloud Observations With Satellite: Shallow Cummentioning
confidence: 99%