2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
88
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
88
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Longline field trials in the western equatorial Atlantic Ocean demonstrated a significantly higher catchability for bigeye tuna on 18/0 circle hooks compared to Jhooks, which is contrary to our results (Pacheco et al, 2011). Catchability on 18/0 circle hooks in our study was reduced for incidental and bycatch species compared to J-hooks which is in contrast to most studies, especially for billfish.…”
Section: Catchability Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Longline field trials in the western equatorial Atlantic Ocean demonstrated a significantly higher catchability for bigeye tuna on 18/0 circle hooks compared to Jhooks, which is contrary to our results (Pacheco et al, 2011). Catchability on 18/0 circle hooks in our study was reduced for incidental and bycatch species compared to J-hooks which is in contrast to most studies, especially for billfish.…”
Section: Catchability Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While there could be a concern regarding the impact of such modifications on the catch rate of valuable target species, such as tunas and billfishes, growing evidence has been demonstrating that some strategies have no negative effects on harvest, and so they would not necessarily pose any economical threat to fisheries. In spite of the catch rate of tunas and billfishes was not herein addressed, a recent study conducted in the same region verified that the circle hook utilized in this experiment did not exhibit any reduction in the CPUE of that target group when compared to the commonly used J-style hook (Pacheco et al, 2011). Thus, it seems advisable to consider such potentially effective measures for integrating more efficient management plans of oceanic fisheries, especially given the fact that they are comparably inexpensive and quick to implement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Circle hooks, as opposed to J-hooks, have been suggested to be an effective tool to reduce bycatch mortality in pelagic longline fisheries (Cooke and Suski, 2004) because they tend to promote hooking in the jaw (Afonso et al, 2011;Montrey, 1999;Pacheco et al, 2011). Gut-hooked sharks show higher at-vessel (Afonso et al, 2011;Kaplan et al, 2007;Kerstetter and Graves, 2006) and postrelease (Campana et al, 2009;Moyes et al, 2006) mortalities due to damage to the esophagus and gastric wall (Borucinska et al, 2002) than jaw-hooked specimens, whose survival rate should be regulated mostly by soak time (Diaz and Serafy, 2005;Morgan and Carlson, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%