2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of covalent and non-covalent imprinting strategies for the synthesis of stigmasterol imprinted polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed binding was largely associated with non-specific interactions. These studies confirmed an earlier report on the failure of the monomers MAA and 4-VP to generate by non-covalent self-assembly approaches stigmasterol-imprinted polymers with acceptable imprinting factors [28]. This outcome can be attributed to an inability to form a stable pre-polymerisation complex, involving the functional monomers and the sterol template, owing to the presence of only a single A-ring C-3β-hydroxyl group of the sterol capable of forming a hydrogen bond with, for example, the N,N -dimethylamido group of the N,N -DMAAM monomer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed binding was largely associated with non-specific interactions. These studies confirmed an earlier report on the failure of the monomers MAA and 4-VP to generate by non-covalent self-assembly approaches stigmasterol-imprinted polymers with acceptable imprinting factors [28]. This outcome can be attributed to an inability to form a stable pre-polymerisation complex, involving the functional monomers and the sterol template, owing to the presence of only a single A-ring C-3β-hydroxyl group of the sterol capable of forming a hydrogen bond with, for example, the N,N -dimethylamido group of the N,N -DMAAM monomer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Upon polymerisation with N,N -dimethylacrylamide (N,N -DMAAM) as the co-monomer, the molecular template, stigmasteryl-3-O-methacrylate, generated a MIP which can be hydrolyzed to afford a complimentary cavity housing carboxylic acid and N,N -dimethylamido group functionalities as hydrogen bonding recognition units [17,28]. On the basis of molecular modelling investigations, it was anticipated that this MIP would be able to recognize not only stigmasterol but also the more valuable campesterol and brassicasterol.…”
Section: Selection Of the Molecular Templatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,16 This approach provides polymers with homogeneous distribution of binding sites, high selectivity, and eliminates nonspecific binding sites which results from excess use of functional monomers. 17 However, the approach is not widely applied because of slow rebinding process of the polymers, 13,18 the need for a pre-step process of designing a stable template-monomer composite through covalent bond formation, and limitation of the approach to diols, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and amines. 16,18 The third approach is the so called intermediate approach or the semi-covalent approach and takes advantage of both noncovalent and covalent interactions.…”
Section: Molecular Imprinting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of molecularly imprinted polymers prepared using non-covalent interactions, a key step in the polymer synthesis is the formation of the complex between the template and functional monomer(s). It is commonly accepted that the stronger the interactions between the template and monomers are, the more stable of the host-guest complex prior to polymerization is [13], and consequently the better imprinting efficiency of the resulted polymers is. Many theoretical [14] and experimental studies [15]- [17] focused on the formation and stability of pre-polymerization complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%