The optimization of cell fate engineering protocols requires evaluating their fidelity, efficiency, or both. We previously adopted CellNet, a computational tool to quantitatively assess the transcriptional fidelity of engineered cells and tissues as compared to their in vivo counterparts based on bulk RNA-Seq. However, this platform and other similar approaches are sensitive to experimental and analytical aspects of transcriptomics methodologies. This makes it challenging to capitalizing on the expansive, publicly available sets of transcriptomic data that reflect the diversity of cell fate engineering protocols. Here, we present Platform-Agnostic CellNet (PACNet), which extends the functionality of CellNet by enabling the assessment of transcriptional profiles in a platform-agnostic manner, and by enabling the comparison of user-supplied data to panels of engineered cell types from state-of-the-art protocols. To demonstrate the utility of PACNet, we evaluated a range of cell fate engineering protocols for cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Through this analysis, we identified the best-performing methods, characterized the extent of intra-protocol and inter-lab variation, and identified common off-target signatures, including a surprising neural and neuroendocrine signature in primary liver-derived organoids. Finally, we made our tool accessible as a user-friendly web application that allows users to upload their own transcriptional profiles and assess their protocols relative to our database of reference engineered samples.