2021
DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of different standard‐setting methods for professional qualifying dental examination

Abstract: Background The outcome of assessments is determined by the standard‐setting method used. Standard setting is the process of deciding what is good enough. A cutoff score of 50% was commonly used in dental schools in Malaysia. This study aims to compare the conventional, norm‐referenced, and modified‐Angoff standard‐setting methods. Methods The norm‐referenced method of standard setting was applied to the real scores of 40 final‐year dental students on a multiple‐choice question (MCQ), a short answer question (S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a performance-based exam developed by Harden in the 1970s to assess students' competencies in relation to knowledge, skills, and attitudes in actual or simulated standardized situations (1). The OSCE is thought to be more objective than traditional exams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a performance-based exam developed by Harden in the 1970s to assess students' competencies in relation to knowledge, skills, and attitudes in actual or simulated standardized situations (1). The OSCE is thought to be more objective than traditional exams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%