2016
DOI: 10.1111/papr.12428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Expectations of Physicians and Patients with Chronic Pain for Pain Clinic Visits

Abstract: We found some agreement and some discordance of clinical expectations between pain patients and physicians. Patient factors may also impact on expectations and comorbidities. Findings from this study will help doctors consider patients' expectations in planning pain clinic visits, improve patient-doctor communication and pain management, and may lead to further hypothesis-driven studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of knowledge, our study is the first to find treatment goal misalignment between paired psoriasis patient–physician using dermatological symptoms as an indicator. Non‐Japanese studies have examined misalignment of disease severity between paired patients and physicians in various disease areas such as atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, pain and other disease areas. For psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, studies on misalignment were mostly on perception of disease severity or treatment satisfaction in paired subjects but the objectives were not on treatment goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of knowledge, our study is the first to find treatment goal misalignment between paired psoriasis patient–physician using dermatological symptoms as an indicator. Non‐Japanese studies have examined misalignment of disease severity between paired patients and physicians in various disease areas such as atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, pain and other disease areas. For psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, studies on misalignment were mostly on perception of disease severity or treatment satisfaction in paired subjects but the objectives were not on treatment goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in spite of this advancement in understanding pain, many attempts still fail to relieve it and improve the quality of the patients’ everyday life. An important element in the effective treatment of pain, especially of the kind not responding to the classic first-line drugs, is to include biological, psychological and social aspects in managing both acute and chronic pain [5,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) recommends interdisciplinary treatment of patients with chronic pain, underlining the need to address not only the aspect of the patients’ somatic feelings but also biological, psychological, and social factors in the model of pain management and to implement psychological, social, recreational, and professional training. Pharmacotherapy remains the basic method of treatment, but it should comprise an element of a complex program of rehabilitation, whose final effect is not only to lower pain intensity but also improve the patients’ quality of life and make it possible for them to return to their families and to society [7,8,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of such units are clinics and counseling centers for pain management. Their primary objectives are to treat patients with acute and chronic pain, educate both healthcare personnel and patients, and participate in the preparation of guidelines and research in the field of pain [10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%