2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27824-5_135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Filters for Ultrasound Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean filter. The mean filter [41,42] replaces each pixel by the average value of the intensities in its neighborhood. It can locally reduce the variance and is easy to implement.…”
Section: Linear Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean filter. The mean filter [41,42] replaces each pixel by the average value of the intensities in its neighborhood. It can locally reduce the variance and is easy to implement.…”
Section: Linear Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Order-statistic filters are particularly effective in reducing noise whose probability density function has significant tail. The median filter [34,41,42] is a special case of order-statistic filters. It preserves the edge sharpness and produces less blurring than mean filter.…”
Section: Adaptive Mean Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complex operations include the "sticks" filter (short line segments) [9], [10] or various types of diffusion filters [11], [12], [13], [14]. Calóope et al [15] provide a comparison of filtering operations for US images. They present and evaluate the mean, median, Frost and MAP filter and also the applicability of the wavelet transformation for this task.…”
Section: A Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria for the evaluation of the pre-processing are: The mean squared error (MSE), the signal-to-MSE ratio (S/MSE) and the edge preservation β [15]. The reduction of noise is analyzed with MSE and S/MSE.…”
Section: A Pre-processing 1) Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ein hoher PI-Wert kann allerdings sowohl auf eine hohe Kontrastmittelkonzentration als auch auf Rauschen hinweisen. Da die Glättung der einzelnen Bilder der Ultraschallsequenz zeitaufwendig und rechenintensiv ist[24,25], wird hier ein anderer Ansatz verfolgt. Anstatt Bild für Bild zu entrauschen, werden die TICs geglättet.…”
unclassified