2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2008.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of flow injection methods for sulfide determination based on phenothiazine dyes produced from diverse aromatic amines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been reported by adopting the same reaction using different analytical techniques like flow injection analysis, solid-phase extraction, and solid-phase reflectometry [ 7 , 8 ]. In addition to the spectrophotometry, various other techniques like atomic florescence spectroscopy (AFS) [ 9 ], atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [ 10 ], flow injection analysis (FIA) [ 11 , 12 ], and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICPAES) [ 13 ] have been successfully utilized for the quantification of sulfide. These techniques require expensive instrumentation and skilled technical personnel to operate the systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been reported by adopting the same reaction using different analytical techniques like flow injection analysis, solid-phase extraction, and solid-phase reflectometry [ 7 , 8 ]. In addition to the spectrophotometry, various other techniques like atomic florescence spectroscopy (AFS) [ 9 ], atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [ 10 ], flow injection analysis (FIA) [ 11 , 12 ], and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICPAES) [ 13 ] have been successfully utilized for the quantification of sulfide. These techniques require expensive instrumentation and skilled technical personnel to operate the systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%