2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-017-1015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered scaleshell mussel (Leptodea leptodon), the fragile papershell (Leptodea fragilis) and their host-fish the freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are no reports on the genetic structure of S. marmoratus populations that cover most of the habitat, from Japan to China. Microsatellite markers used in the exploration of population genetic structure usually exhibit co‐dominant inheritance and high diversity, with relatively modest analysis expense (Chong & Roe, ; Du et al, ; Kitson‐Walters et al, ). This study aimed to draw a comprehensive picture of the patterns of genetic diversity and structure along the distribution area in the coastal waters of the northwestern Pacific, across a large latitudinal range, using microsatellite markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are no reports on the genetic structure of S. marmoratus populations that cover most of the habitat, from Japan to China. Microsatellite markers used in the exploration of population genetic structure usually exhibit co‐dominant inheritance and high diversity, with relatively modest analysis expense (Chong & Roe, ; Du et al, ; Kitson‐Walters et al, ). This study aimed to draw a comprehensive picture of the patterns of genetic diversity and structure along the distribution area in the coastal waters of the northwestern Pacific, across a large latitudinal range, using microsatellite markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no reports on the genetic structure of S. marmoratus populations that cover most of the habitat, from Japan to China. Microsatellite markers used in the exploration of population genetic structure usually exhibit co-dominant inheritance and high diversity, with relatively modest analysis expense (Chong & Roe, 2018;Du et al, 2016;Kitson-Walters et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Host fish vagility may also be an important factor on the population structure observed in the Sheepnose. Previous studies on freshwater mussels have invoked host fishes as contributing to or reinforcing the population structure (Chong & Roe, 2018; Zanatta & Wilson, 2011). The most recent information indicates that hosts of the Sheepnose include cyprinids (Hove et al, 2015) which may lack the dispersal capabilities of larger riverine fishes (Comte & Olden, 2018) and therefore contribute to the isolation between populations and demes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent anthropogenic processes such as habitat destruction and fragmentation often lead to reduced population sizes and connectivity, reducing the genetic diversity and increasing the genetic differentiation 4 . In addition, life history traits and species interactions affect the genetic structure of populations at different spatial and temporal scales 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%