2021
DOI: 10.1177/1744259120988760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of hygrothermal simulation results derived from four simulation tools

Abstract: The objective of this work was to compare the hygrothermal responses and the moisture performance of four wood-frame walls as predicted by four hygrothermal (HAM) simulation tools, namely: DELPHIN, WUFI, hygIRC and COMSOL. The four wall systems differ only in their cladding type; these were fibreboard, vinyl, stucco and brick. Three Canadian cities having different climates were selected for simulations: Ottawa, Ontario; Vancouver, British Columbia and Calgary, Alberta. In each city, simulations were run for 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the most obvious cause of error is the inaccuracies in the material properties, which was studied by Yamamoto and Takada (2022). Also, because numerical simulation consists of vast number of details related to for example, numerical methods, discretization and treatment of tabulated nonlinear material properties, the choice of simulation program has also certain effect on the results (Defo et al, 2022). However, lesser attention is often paid to the fact that the simulation of combined heat and moisture transfer in building physical examinations rely typically on local equilibrium assumption, which allows using only one variable to determine the local state of water in the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most obvious cause of error is the inaccuracies in the material properties, which was studied by Yamamoto and Takada (2022). Also, because numerical simulation consists of vast number of details related to for example, numerical methods, discretization and treatment of tabulated nonlinear material properties, the choice of simulation program has also certain effect on the results (Defo et al, 2022). However, lesser attention is often paid to the fact that the simulation of combined heat and moisture transfer in building physical examinations rely typically on local equilibrium assumption, which allows using only one variable to determine the local state of water in the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main focus lies on the vapour permeability ratio between in- and exterior sheathing to assess the risk on mould growth and/or interstitial condensation (Geving and Holme, 2013; Kalamees and Vinha, 2003; Karagiozis, 2002). Most of these studies are limited to 1D-simulations (Defo et al, 2022; Fu et al, 2020; Gatland et al, 2007; Kabatova et al, 2019; Kalamees and Vinha, 2003; Pihelo and Kalamees, 2016; Straube and Finch, 2009), despite the inherent 2D or 3D character of timber frame walls. And the few two-dimensional simulations that can be found in literature mainly investigate the effect of the ventilated cavity (Langmans et al, 2013; Laukkarinen et al, 2021; Straube and Finch, 2009; Vanpachtenbeke et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the gradual maturity of the theoretical model of hygrothermal prediction, based on those theoretical models, hygrothermal prediction simulation software WUFI has been developed and widely used [18]. It has been proven that WUFI can be used in a wide range of building materials, such as lightweight timber-frame [19], cross-laminated timber [20], and bamboo-wood composite materials [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%