2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of insulin use, glycemic control, and health care costs with insulin detemir and insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, evidence is limited regarding the effectiveness of basal insulin in a real-world setting [5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, evidence is limited regarding the effectiveness of basal insulin in a real-world setting [5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In an analysis of the administrative health care claims of patients initiating either insulin detemir or insulin glargine in the US, researchers found that 26% of these patients achieved an HbA1c level 57.0% after six months 7 . Poor glycemic control outcomes have been linked to low adherence to insulin treatment, inadequate titration of insulin dosage, therapeutic inertia, and the progressive loss of beta cell function 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…insulin detemir [24,29,36,40,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. In many routine clinical practice studies, therefore, a considerable proportion of patients remain above recommended glycemic targets despite transition to insulin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This often results in low treatment persistence, which has been defined as the proportion of patients who remained on treatment for a specific time or the duration of time from initiation to discontinuation of therapy [5,6]. Few studies have examined the persistence of type 2 diabetes patients on basal insulins in a real-world setting and previous results have been somewhat controversial [7,8]. In Germany, there is a lack of real-world evidence studies on the basal insulin treatment persistence and related factors in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%