Breast cancer incidence increases considerably in women who migrate from Japan to the United States. Based on the hypothesis that mammographic density in healthy mammograms reflects differences in breast cancer risk, we compared mammographic density in 3 groups of women at different levels of risk: Caucasian and Japanese women in Hawaii and Japanese women in Japan. In a cross-sectional design, preand postmenopausal women without a history of breast cancer and with a mammogram free of suspicious lesions were recruited in mammography clinics and completed a selfadministered questionnaire. Cranio-caudal mammograms were scanned into a computer and the densities measured using a computer-assisted method. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and multiple linear regression. Breast size among women of Japanese ancestry was similar in Hawaii and Japan but 50% smaller than that among Caucasian women. Dense areas were smallest among women in Japan, intermediate among Japanese women in Hawaii and largest among Caucasian women. Percent densities were greater in Japanese women than Caucasian women because of the larger breast sizes in Caucasians. However, percent densities were significantly higher among Japanese women in Hawaii than in Japan. These results indicate that the size of the total breast differs primarily by ethnicity and the size of the dense areas differs mainly by place of residence. Therefore, when comparing ethnic groups with distinct physical proportions, the absolute size of the dense areas appears to be a better measure of breast cancer risk than the relative density. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Key words: mammographic density; Japan; Hawaii; breast cancer; mammogramBreast cancer incidence among women in Japan is much lower than among women of Japanese ancestry living in the United States. Age-adjusted (to the world standard population) incidence rates were 30.8 cases/100,000 in Japan 1 compared to 78.3 and 97.1 cases/100,000 among women of Japanese and Caucasian ancestry in Hawaii, respectively (unpublished report for 1990 -1992 from the Hawaii Tumor Registry). Reasons for the discrepant breast cancer rates are not well understood, but the fact that risk in migrants increases over 2 or 3 generations 2,3 suggests that environmental factors, including diet, 4 may be determinants of risk in addition to the well-established reproductive factors, adult adiposity, weight change and height. 5 Mammographic density patterns, which refer to the distribution of fat, connective and epithelial tissue in the healthy female breast, have been related to breast cancer risk. 6 A high percentage of dense parenchyma on mammographic images appears to confer a 4-fold risk of developing breast cancer. 7 Immigration from Japan to Hawaii occurred primarily during 1868 -1924, 8 when more than 200,000 Japanese came to Hawaii. We hypothesized that Japanese women in Hawaii are more likely to have a dense parenchymal pattern than women in Japan. The primary objective of our cross-sectional study was to compare mammographic density charact...