1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf01982213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of maximum cystometric bladder capacity with maximum environmental voided volumes

Abstract: The aim of the study was, to determine whether maximum cystometric capacity accurately reflects the maximum functional bladder volume in women with urinary incontinence. We performed a retrospective chart review involving 85 women between the ages of 22 and 89 with primary complaints of urinary incontinence. The maximum cystometric capacity as determined by cystometry was compared with the maximum environmental voided volumes as recorded in a 24-hour voiding diary, using Pearson's correlation coefficients and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a similar study, Ertberg et al reported the same correlation to be poor [4]. In our study, we found that the maximum daytime void volume excluding first morning void was well-correlated with VSD determined by filling cystometry (ρ = 0.43 to 0.51, all P <0.001), similar to Yoon and Swift [15]. Ertberg et al and Yoon and Swift both reported that the bladder diary capacity was significantly higher than cystometry capacity (400 ml vs. 215 ml [median], P  = 0.017 [4]; and 401 ml vs. 342 ml [mean] [15]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in a similar study, Ertberg et al reported the same correlation to be poor [4]. In our study, we found that the maximum daytime void volume excluding first morning void was well-correlated with VSD determined by filling cystometry (ρ = 0.43 to 0.51, all P <0.001), similar to Yoon and Swift [15]. Ertberg et al and Yoon and Swift both reported that the bladder diary capacity was significantly higher than cystometry capacity (400 ml vs. 215 ml [median], P  = 0.017 [4]; and 401 ml vs. 342 ml [mean] [15]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In our study, we found that the maximum daytime void volume excluding first morning void was well-correlated with VSD determined by filling cystometry (ρ = 0.43 to 0.51, all P <0.001), similar to Yoon and Swift [15]. Ertberg et al and Yoon and Swift both reported that the bladder diary capacity was significantly higher than cystometry capacity (400 ml vs. 215 ml [median], P  = 0.017 [4]; and 401 ml vs. 342 ml [mean] [15]). McCormack et al reported that bladder capacity from cystoscopy was higher than that from bladder diary by 206 ml [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Bladder behavior studied with cystometry or with bladder diary has been shown to give different results. 3,4 Several studies have shown that bladder motor function, capacity, compliance depend on filling speed. [5][6][7] To our knowledge, there is no study available comparing bladder volumes related to different grades of desire to void between the SR-BD and cystometric bladder filling (CBF) in women with urinary incontinence (UI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bladder sensations have been studied mostly with the use of invasive cystometry [7,8]. However, it has been demonstrated that the rate of filling in cystometry or even the use of a catheter gives distorted results [9][10][11]. Therefore, it has been recommended that evaluation of bladder sensations during daily activities is the most representative [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%