2009
DOI: 10.1080/15470140902949695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Motivators and Inhibitors for Association Meeting Attendance for Three Generational Cohorts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the framework combines previously disparate evaluation parameters into a distinct pathway that can be used to assess a destination's MICE offering in its entirety. It addresses the scarcity of research that simultaneously considers the attendee's motivation and image-related considerations pertaining to a MICE destination; much work has focused on one (see, for example, Severt et al, 2007;Severt et al, 2009;Yoo & Chon, 2008) or the other (see, for example, Boo et al, 2008;Lee & Back, 2007). Third, in developing and validating this framework in the context of MICE tourism, the authors have advanced the PCI agenda in tourism research: the need to explore the underlying relationships of PCI in the context of specific product categories, brands, and/or tourism places (Elliot et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the framework combines previously disparate evaluation parameters into a distinct pathway that can be used to assess a destination's MICE offering in its entirety. It addresses the scarcity of research that simultaneously considers the attendee's motivation and image-related considerations pertaining to a MICE destination; much work has focused on one (see, for example, Severt et al, 2007;Severt et al, 2009;Yoo & Chon, 2008) or the other (see, for example, Boo et al, 2008;Lee & Back, 2007). Third, in developing and validating this framework in the context of MICE tourism, the authors have advanced the PCI agenda in tourism research: the need to explore the underlying relationships of PCI in the context of specific product categories, brands, and/or tourism places (Elliot et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, research in the convention scenario has emphasized the importance of professional and social networking opportunities to attendees (Kim, Lee, & Kim, 2012;Rittichainuwat, Beck, & Lalopa, 2001;Yoo & Chon, 2008). On the other hand, personal benefits have been found to include sightseeing, outdoor recreation, visiting friends/relatives (Rittichainuwat et al, 2001;Severt, Fjelstul, & Breiter, 2009), participating in social or recreational programs, escaping from routine work (Yoo & Chon, 2008), spouse/family programs (Severt, Wang, Chen, & Breiter, 2007), novelty seeking, friendship enhancement (Kim et al, 2012a), entertainment, shopping (Kozak & Kayar, 2009), and the opportunity to visit a new destination (Bauer, Law, Tse, & Weber, 2008), among others. Thus, the notion that attendees add pleasure to business in MICE tourism has been accepted in the literature (Davidson, 2003;Hankinson, 2005).…”
Section: Benefits Of Mice Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several academic studies have been conducted to understand conference motivation. Mair and Thomspon (), in reviewing the event literature from 1985 to 2007, identified five common conference motivation factors of cost, location, networking opportunities, personal/professional development, and social aspects that have been frequently identified in subsequent conference motivation research (e.g., Mair, ; Severt, Fjelstul, & Breiter, ; Tanford, Montgomery, & Nelson, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the conference literature, several segmentation studies have also been conducted. Severt et al () compared the motivators and inhibitors for association meeting attendance for three age cohorts that included Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y. Despite identifying conference motivation differences, the authors concluded that the segments were not differentiated based on their age.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation