2022
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Native Grass and Triticale Pastures during Late Winter for Growing Cattle in Semiarid, Subtropical Regions

Abstract: Forage-based beef production is one of the most productive agricultural systems, especially in semiarid, subtropical environments, yet it is temporally variable due to climatic factors. Dormant native perennial warm-season grasses are available for grazing from autumn through spring; however, their protein concentration is inadequate to support growing cattle. Winter cereal forages, such as triticale [×Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus (Secale × Triticum)], can fill fall through spring forage gaps with sufficie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kirkegaard et al [21] reported that heavy grazing reduced grain yield compared to light grazing possibly because of the need for a longer recovery period after heavy grazing to regenerate leaf material for photosynthesis [17]. Grazing pressure in the present study was consistent with that applied to cereal forages in other studies at this location [12] and may have been heavy in regard to canola. Kirkegaard et al [21] attributed lesser forage mass for grazed vs. mowed canola to a difference in defoliation, with more intensive defoliation under grazing due to selectivity of the more palatable leaf material.…”
Section: Forage Mass and Nutritive Valuesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kirkegaard et al [21] reported that heavy grazing reduced grain yield compared to light grazing possibly because of the need for a longer recovery period after heavy grazing to regenerate leaf material for photosynthesis [17]. Grazing pressure in the present study was consistent with that applied to cereal forages in other studies at this location [12] and may have been heavy in regard to canola. Kirkegaard et al [21] attributed lesser forage mass for grazed vs. mowed canola to a difference in defoliation, with more intensive defoliation under grazing due to selectivity of the more palatable leaf material.…”
Section: Forage Mass and Nutritive Valuesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The cereal rye in 2016-17 of the present study had a similar initial forage mass to triticale (× Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus (Secale × Triticum)) [12]. Means within the interaction followed by similar letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05.…”
Section: Forage Mass and Nutritive Valuementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…forages [25]. Using other available forages and even dormant native grass pastures for early autumn grazing would allow for delayed grazing of winter cereals for increased forage accumulation [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When environmental conditions limit production of perennial forage crops, annual species can be effectively used [5]. Winter annual cereal forages perform well in semiarid, subtropical regions [6,7] where they form a significant component of livestock operations for autumn through spring backgrounding of stocker cattle (Bos taurus) in either grazeout or graze-grain systems [8][9][10], which fits well with spring through autumn grazing of perennial cool-season pastures [11] and annual and perennial warm-season pastures [12][13][14]. Currently used winter cereals for pasture include oat (Avena sativa) [8], rye (Secale cereale) [3], triticale [×Triticosecale Wittm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%