2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf03166916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of outcome scores in os calcis fractures

Abstract: The Maryland Foot Score measures what it attempts to measure and therefore it has content validity for pain and physical function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical results appear to be comparable with those observed following ORIF [21,23,[41][42][43][44], and are impressive compared with those of Sanders et al [21] and Heffernan et al [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The clinical results appear to be comparable with those observed following ORIF [21,23,[41][42][43][44], and are impressive compared with those of Sanders et al [21] and Heffernan et al [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Scores are based on a 100-point scale and are commonly graded as follows: excellent (90-100 points), good (75-89 points), fair (51-74 points), and failure (<50 points). 36 Evidence for construct validity is available based on data from 25 subjects with intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The mean age at the time of injury was 44 years (age range, 22-65 years), and the mean follow-up was 2.5 years (range, 1-4 years).…”
Section: Mfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature search identified the following 11 instruments that met the objective of this review: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FA), 40 Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), 26 Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), 54 Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), 31 Foot Function Index (FFI), 1,17,46,72 Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), 13 Juvenile Arthritis Foot Disability Index (JAFI), 7 Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS), 2,33,78 Maryland Foot Score (MFS), 36 Rowan Foot Pain Assessment Questionnaire (ROFPAQ), 71 and Sports Ankle Rating System quality of life (QOL) measure. 84 The reference lists in the articles describing these 11 instruments were reviewed to identify instruments missed by this search.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a validated [25] scoring system ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100 (excellent, 90-100; good, 75-89; fair, 50-74; failure \50). It evaluates subjective and objective elements such as pain (maximum score 45), function (maximum score 40, subdivided into gait, stability, use of walking aids, limp, type of shoes required, walking distance), cosmesis (maximum score 10), and movement of the ankle, subtalar, midfoot and metatarsophalangeal joints (maximum score 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%