1992
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1108:acoqan>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Quasigeostrophic and Nonquasigeostrophic Vertical Motions for a Model-simulated Rapidly Intensifying Marine Extratropical Cyclone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Krishnamurti (1968) and Pauley and Nieman (1992), the boundary effect (providing little insight) on the inside area of the model domain has to be removed in the calculation of the contributions of the individual internal forcing terms. This can be accomplished by using the zero lateral boundary conditions (Krishnamurti, 1968;Pauley and Nieman, 1992) since the boundary effect on the inside area is caused by the iteration-induced propagation of the boundary values. Be aware that the iteration-induced signal propagation of a dominant system might mask the signal of a nearby relatively weak system of interest.…”
Section: Derivation Of a Complete Geopotential Numerical Model And Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to Krishnamurti (1968) and Pauley and Nieman (1992), the boundary effect (providing little insight) on the inside area of the model domain has to be removed in the calculation of the contributions of the individual internal forcing terms. This can be accomplished by using the zero lateral boundary conditions (Krishnamurti, 1968;Pauley and Nieman, 1992) since the boundary effect on the inside area is caused by the iteration-induced propagation of the boundary values. Be aware that the iteration-induced signal propagation of a dominant system might mask the signal of a nearby relatively weak system of interest.…”
Section: Derivation Of a Complete Geopotential Numerical Model And Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ith internal forcing effect (i.e. i ) attributed to the ith internal forcing f i is obtained from solving the Poisson equation ∇ 2 2 i = f i with zero lateral boundary conditions (in order to remove the boundary effect on the inside area (Krishnamurti, 1968;Pauley and Nieman, 1992) deviation from area ). The reason for using the symbol DFRM is merely that the 'deviation from the regional mean' is easier to follow than the 'deviation from the boundary effect'.…”
Section: The Systematic Information Behind the Forcing Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations