2013
DOI: 10.5194/amt-6-1585-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of rainfall measurements from multiple instruments

Abstract: Simultaneous observations of rainfall collected by a tipping bucket rain gauge (TBRG), a weighing rain gauge (WRG), an optical rain gauge (ORG), a present weather detector (PWD), a Joss–Waldvogel disdrometer (JWD), and a 2-D video disdrometer (2DVD) during January to October 2012 were analyzed to evaluate how accurately they measure rainfall and drop size distributions (DSDs). For the long-term observations, there were different discrepancies in rain amounts from six instruments on the order of 0% to 27.7%. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicator was used as measure to compare the accuracy of the calculated rainfall intensities using the TC and CS method and the data of the DRTB gauges [26,41]. For Zhurucay, the intensity given by the LPM was adopted as the reference, whose resolution (0.01 mm) is 10 times higher than the resolution of the most accurate Texas TB rain gauge used in this study, and at least 20 times higher than the widely applied Davis TB rain gauge in the Andes region.…”
Section: Methodology To Calculate the Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicator was used as measure to compare the accuracy of the calculated rainfall intensities using the TC and CS method and the data of the DRTB gauges [26,41]. For Zhurucay, the intensity given by the LPM was adopted as the reference, whose resolution (0.01 mm) is 10 times higher than the resolution of the most accurate Texas TB rain gauge used in this study, and at least 20 times higher than the widely applied Davis TB rain gauge in the Andes region.…”
Section: Methodology To Calculate the Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is related to erosion models, which commonly employ 30-min timescale precipitation data. The rainfall intensity classes were defined based on their exceedance curves, following the recommendations of [26]. For both study areas, Zhurucay and Quinuas, the categories of 0-1, 1-2, 2-5, and 5-10 mm·h −1 were defined.…”
Section: Intensity Magnitudes and Timescales Of Data Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation accumulation is relatively well measured by rain gauges, but instantaneous rain rate is very difficult to measure with high precision, even using pluviographs or disdrometers (Liu et al 2013). Averaged intensities strongly depend on averaging time and rainfall time structure, which differs according to the natural processes that caused it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RD-80 measures the drop size using a Styrofoam cone with a sampling cross-sectional area of 50 cm 2 and has the ability to transform the vertical momentum of the drops to an electrical signal whose amplitude is a function of the drop diameter [16].…”
Section: Methods and Data Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%