2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of semi-custom and custom foot orthotic devices in high- and low-arched individuals during walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
75
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these data, it does not appear that arch height influences comfort of the orthotic device, regardless of the amount of lateral wedge used. This is in agreement with Zifchock and Davis (2008), who demonstrated that foot type did not influence the comfort of the orthotic device. In effect, clinicians prescribing laterally wedged devices may not need to screen for various arch types for concern of acute discomfort in the devices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on these data, it does not appear that arch height influences comfort of the orthotic device, regardless of the amount of lateral wedge used. This is in agreement with Zifchock and Davis (2008), who demonstrated that foot type did not influence the comfort of the orthotic device. In effect, clinicians prescribing laterally wedged devices may not need to screen for various arch types for concern of acute discomfort in the devices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[21,38] These results are in 271 opposition to our study and others, who have reported a non-significant 1 degree 272 reduction in peak rearfoot eversion with orthotic use. [16,18,39] Several potential 273 reasons exist for the discrepancies in our results and those showing a significant effect.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This information is useful for clinically defining an individual's foot structure, and it will assist in future studies that seek to develop categorical analyses between foot types. Categorical analyses have been performed for decades based on arch height 11,12 ; however, new emphasis 4,5 of the importance of arch flexibility in describing foot structure supports the need for a similar classification scheme based on this measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%