2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9e51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Simulated JWST Observations Derived from Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Chemistry Models of Giant Exoplanets

Abstract: We aim to see if the difference between equilibrium and disequilibrium chemistry is observable in the atmospheres of transiting planets by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). We perform a case study comparing the dayside emission spectra of three planets like HD 189733b, WASP-80b, and GJ436b, in and out of chemical equilibrium at two metallicities each. These three planets were chosen because they span a large range of planetary masses and equilibrium temperatures, from hot and Jupiter-sized to warm and Nep… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the metallicity posterior shifted by 0.1σ for the transit retrieval and 0.5σ for the eclipse retrieval; the C/O ratio posterior shifted by 0.06σ for both transit and eclipse retrievals. We conclude that the effects of disequilibrium chemistry are below our detection threshold, in good agreement with the predictions of the 1D models from Venot et al (2012) and Blumenthal et al (2018).…”
Section: Aerosol Propertiessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the metallicity posterior shifted by 0.1σ for the transit retrieval and 0.5σ for the eclipse retrieval; the C/O ratio posterior shifted by 0.06σ for both transit and eclipse retrievals. We conclude that the effects of disequilibrium chemistry are below our detection threshold, in good agreement with the predictions of the 1D models from Venot et al (2012) and Blumenthal et al (2018).…”
Section: Aerosol Propertiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Their Figure 10 shows that the disequilibrium-induced brightness temperature discrepancy is at most several Kelvin (less than 1%), while the transit radius discrepancy is at most ∼30 ppm. Blumenthal et al (2018) also model the emission spectrum under equilibrium and nonequilibrium conditions, finding no detectable difference even with JWST (their Figure 3). Other studies report changes in abundance as a result of disequilibrium chemistry, but do not compare the resulting spectra to the equilibrium model predictions.…”
Section: Aerosol Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the opposite, scattered spectra can inform us on the stability and the redundancy in the information content of Ariel spectra. Previous studies have used both types to simulate observations by future telescopes (Barstow et al 2012;Tinetti et al 2015Tinetti et al , 2018Feng et al 2016Feng et al , 2018Rocchetto et al 2016;Batalha et al 2017;Mollière et al 2017;Blumenthal et al 2018;Changeat et al 2019aChangeat et al , 2019bEdwards et al 2019b;Lustig-Yaeger et al 2019). Feng et al (2018) results predicted that the retrieved uncertainties should be similar in both scattered and unscattered runs but that the retrieved mean could be different.…”
Section: The Ability Of Ariel To Reveal Chemical Trends In Exoplanetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these two studies did not attempt detailed predictions of the impact of disequilibrium processes on the spectra of KELT-9. Finally, a possibility to study disequilibrium chemistry in atmospheres of three planets (HD 189733 b, WASP-80 b, and GJ 436 b, all having T eq < 1200 K) with future space missions was carried out in Blumenthal et al (2018), concluding that, for example, with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) it will be possible to robustly constrain the difference between equilibrium and disequilibrium chemistry. Analyzing chemistry in HJs provides an important test for existing kinetic models as they include many poorly known parameters (e.g., turbulent diffusion coefficients, photodissociation cross-section, reaction rate coefficients, and choice of the kinetic network.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%