2014
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2014.932801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Some Methods for the Selection of a Common Eigenvector Model for the Covariance Matrices of Two Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the normally distributed data, the normalization process (5.2) is skipped and W g = X g 1/2 g . For a sufficiently large sample size the covariance matrix of W g is approximately g (Pepler, Uys, and Nel 2016). The underlying common eigenvectors ( ) are obtained from = A A/8 where A : 8× p is simulated from a multivariate normal distribution with a zero mean and with an identity covariance matrix.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the normally distributed data, the normalization process (5.2) is skipped and W g = X g 1/2 g . For a sufficiently large sample size the covariance matrix of W g is approximately g (Pepler, Uys, and Nel 2016). The underlying common eigenvectors ( ) are obtained from = A A/8 where A : 8× p is simulated from a multivariate normal distribution with a zero mean and with an identity covariance matrix.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify an appropriate common eigenvector model for the data, two goodnessof-fit measurements were proposed by Flury (1988): a log-likelihood ratio (LR) statistic and the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Pepler, Uys, and Nel (2016) compared 8 methods for selecting suitable common eigenvector models, including the LR statistic and AIC. This article considers three model identification methods: the AIC, the Schwarz criterion [also known as the Bayesian information criterion (BIC)], and the LR statistic, to be used to identify an appropriate model for a given dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to provide asymptotic results as the number of matrices goes to infinity. Different from the literature where n is fixed (Flury, 1987;Boik, 2002;Pepler et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2019), Assumptions A (2) and (3) assume (λ i1 , . .…”
Section: Model and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these extensions of CPCA, PCPCA continues to be appealing, as it relaxes the assumption of a completely common eigenspace across matrices while partially preserving the straightforward interpretation of common eigenvectors, i.e., eigenvectors shared across matrices. Related work on this topic includes Krzanowski (1984), Schott (1999), Boik (2002), Lock et al (2013) and Pepler et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Durbin-Watson test was used to test for autocorrelation. The Durbin-Watson statistic was computed following Equation (18).…”
Section: Stationarity Of Extended Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%