2019 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ubmk.2019.8907063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Text Classifiers on IT Incidents Using WEKA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, a statement can be made about which ML algorithms and solutions have proven themselves during the past 5 years not in one paper only, but in various papers and hence in various use cases. Generally, ML algorithms like SVM and RF have proven to be more accurate and precise than "older" rules-based approaches or Decision Trees [2,8,23]. Also, there is some evidence that DNNs could outperform the present best-performing algorithms SVM and RF, especially in the case of large training data and many classes to classify tickets in [21,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, a statement can be made about which ML algorithms and solutions have proven themselves during the past 5 years not in one paper only, but in various papers and hence in various use cases. Generally, ML algorithms like SVM and RF have proven to be more accurate and precise than "older" rules-based approaches or Decision Trees [2,8,23]. Also, there is some evidence that DNNs could outperform the present best-performing algorithms SVM and RF, especially in the case of large training data and many classes to classify tickets in [21,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these 6 papers accuracies between 63% [37] and 98% [18] were reached. Those results are heavily depending on the data set used, but overall the papers an accuracy between 80-90% for SVM seems reasonable [1,2,8,9,18,37].…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms Usedmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations