1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(76)80294-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the analytical utility of three different potential ramp techniques in voltammetry, using a carbon-paste electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On substitution of the diffusion-coefficient value (12.2 × 10 6 cm s-1 ) in the following equation: i p = (2.69 × 10 5 ) n 3/2 D 1/2 υ 1/2 C o where i p is the peak current, n is the stoichiometric number of electrons involved in the electrode reaction, A is the area of electrode in cm 2 , D o is the diffusion coefficient of (cm 2 s -1 ), C o is the concentration (mol/cm 3 ) and υ is the scan rate in (Vs -1 ). Based on the above equation the surface area of the electrode was found to be 0.0287 cm 2 [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Calculation Of Surface Area Of the Cpementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On substitution of the diffusion-coefficient value (12.2 × 10 6 cm s-1 ) in the following equation: i p = (2.69 × 10 5 ) n 3/2 D 1/2 υ 1/2 C o where i p is the peak current, n is the stoichiometric number of electrons involved in the electrode reaction, A is the area of electrode in cm 2 , D o is the diffusion coefficient of (cm 2 s -1 ), C o is the concentration (mol/cm 3 ) and υ is the scan rate in (Vs -1 ). Based on the above equation the surface area of the electrode was found to be 0.0287 cm 2 [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Calculation Of Surface Area Of the Cpementioning
confidence: 99%