2020
DOI: 10.2478/pjst-2020-0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Effects of Resistance and Endurance Training Protocols on Serum Irisin Level and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Sedentary Obese Women

Abstract: Introduction. Studies have revealed that the anabolic effect of irisin on bone is mediated by an increase in alkaline phosphatase. However, few studies have investigated the interactive effect of irisin on alkaline phosphatase after exercise training. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the impact of endurance and resistance training protocols on serum irisin concentration and total alkaline phosphatase activity in sedentary obese women. Material and methods. Forty-f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifteen other articles were removed because of the following reasons: (a) did not include control group (Brinkmann et al, 2022[ 13 ]; Dünnwald et al, 2019[ 21 ]; Norheim et al, 2014[ 56 ]; Otero-Díaz et al, 2018[ 59 ]; Rashid et al, 2020[ 64 ]; Sari-Sarraf et al, 2017[ 69 ]; Tsuchiya et al, 2015[ 75 ]; Winn et al, 2017[ 78 ]), (b) participants with mean age <18 years (Archundia-Herrera et al, 2017[ 3 ]; Blizzard LeBlanc et al, 2017[ 9 ]; Dundar et al, 2021[ 20 ]), (c) acute trials (a training period less than two weeks or performing only an acute exercise testing) (Kraemer et al, 2014[ 45 ]; Tsuchiya et al, 2014[ 74 ]), (d) lack of access to data (Hecksteden et al, 2013[ 32 ]; Micielska et al, 2019[ 49 ]). Twenty-four articles (Amanat et al, 2020[ 2 ]; Azimi Rashti et al, 2019[ 6 ]; Bagheri et al, 2020[ 7 ]; Banitalebi et al, 2019[ 8 ]; Bonfante et al, 2017[ 10 ]; Briken et al, 2016[ 12 ]; Dianatinasab et al, 2020[ 19 ]; Enteshary et al, 2019[ 24 ]; Ghanbari-Niaki et al, 2018[ 29 ]; Jafari et al, 2020[ 37 ]; Jaffari et al, 2020[ 38 ]; Kim et al, 2016[ 42 ]; Korkmaz et al, 2019[ 44 ]; Miyamoto-Mikami et al, 2015[ 50 ]; Motahari Rad et al, 2020[ 52 ]; Murawska-Cialowicz et al, 2020[ 54 ]; Nazari et al, 2017[ 55 ]; Pekkala et al, 2013[ 61 ]; Poutafkand et al, 2020[ 62 ]; Rezaeimanesh, 2020[ 65 ]; Safarimosavi et al, 2021[ 67 ]; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al, 2014[ 70 ]; Tofighi et al, 2017[ 73 ]; Zhao et al, 2017[ 80 ]) met our inclusion criteria and were entered in the meta-analysis (PRISMA flow diagram; Figure 1 (Fig. 1) ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fifteen other articles were removed because of the following reasons: (a) did not include control group (Brinkmann et al, 2022[ 13 ]; Dünnwald et al, 2019[ 21 ]; Norheim et al, 2014[ 56 ]; Otero-Díaz et al, 2018[ 59 ]; Rashid et al, 2020[ 64 ]; Sari-Sarraf et al, 2017[ 69 ]; Tsuchiya et al, 2015[ 75 ]; Winn et al, 2017[ 78 ]), (b) participants with mean age <18 years (Archundia-Herrera et al, 2017[ 3 ]; Blizzard LeBlanc et al, 2017[ 9 ]; Dundar et al, 2021[ 20 ]), (c) acute trials (a training period less than two weeks or performing only an acute exercise testing) (Kraemer et al, 2014[ 45 ]; Tsuchiya et al, 2014[ 74 ]), (d) lack of access to data (Hecksteden et al, 2013[ 32 ]; Micielska et al, 2019[ 49 ]). Twenty-four articles (Amanat et al, 2020[ 2 ]; Azimi Rashti et al, 2019[ 6 ]; Bagheri et al, 2020[ 7 ]; Banitalebi et al, 2019[ 8 ]; Bonfante et al, 2017[ 10 ]; Briken et al, 2016[ 12 ]; Dianatinasab et al, 2020[ 19 ]; Enteshary et al, 2019[ 24 ]; Ghanbari-Niaki et al, 2018[ 29 ]; Jafari et al, 2020[ 37 ]; Jaffari et al, 2020[ 38 ]; Kim et al, 2016[ 42 ]; Korkmaz et al, 2019[ 44 ]; Miyamoto-Mikami et al, 2015[ 50 ]; Motahari Rad et al, 2020[ 52 ]; Murawska-Cialowicz et al, 2020[ 54 ]; Nazari et al, 2017[ 55 ]; Pekkala et al, 2013[ 61 ]; Poutafkand et al, 2020[ 62 ]; Rezaeimanesh, 2020[ 65 ]; Safarimosavi et al, 2021[ 67 ]; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al, 2014[ 70 ]; Tofighi et al, 2017[ 73 ]; Zhao et al, 2017[ 80 ]) met our inclusion criteria and were entered in the meta-analysis (PRISMA flow diagram; Figure 1 (Fig. 1) ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention period of studies varied from 8 to 24 weeks, with each session's length of range 15-90 min. Twelve studies exclusively recruited male subjects (Bagheri et al, 2020[ 7 ]; Bonfante et al, 2017[ 10 ]; Jafari et al, 2020[ 37 ]; Jaffari et al, 2020[ 38 ]; Korkmaz et al, 2019[ 44 ]; Motahari Rad et al, 2020[ 52 ]; Murawska-Cialowicz et al, 2020[ 54 ]; Nazari et al, 2017[ 55 ]; Pekkala et al, 2013[ 61 ]; Rezaeimanesh, 2020[ 65 ]; Safarimosavi et al, 2021[ 67 ]; Zhao et al, 2017[ 80 ]), eight studies exclusively recruited female subjects (Amanat et al, 2020[ 2 ]; Azimi Rashti et al, 2019[ 6 ]; Banitalebi et al, 2019[ 8 ]; Dianatinasab et al, 2020[ 19 ]; Enteshary et al, 2019[ 24 ]; Ghanbari-Niaki et al, 2018[ 29 ]; Poutafkand et al, 2020[ 62 ]; Tofighi et al, 2017[ 73 ]), and four studies recruited both males and females (Briken et al, 2016[ 12 ]; Kim et al, 2016[ 42 ]; Miyamoto-Mikami et al, 2015[ 50 ]; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al, 2014[ 70 ]). In 22 studies, the mean age of subjects varied from 22.5 to 62.1 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, even active individuals may be exposed to the negative effects of insufficient physical activity when performing sedentary jobs [24]. Performing such jobs is associated with an increased risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes, premature deaths and other health problems [23,34]. The percentage of people performing sedentary work has increased significantly in recent decades [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%