2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the electrochemical recovery of palladium using a parallel flat plate flow-by reactor and a rotating cylinder electrode reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normalized copper concentration should vary according to the first‐order kinetic model given in Equation . The first‐order reaction rate constant k can be determined by plotting the normalized copper concentration versus time of electrolysis, and for a flat plate electrode can be expressed by Equation lnCtC0=italickt k=k()AeVr …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalized copper concentration should vary according to the first‐order kinetic model given in Equation . The first‐order reaction rate constant k can be determined by plotting the normalized copper concentration versus time of electrolysis, and for a flat plate electrode can be expressed by Equation lnCtC0=italickt k=k()AeVr …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotating cylinder electrochemical reactor is one of the most important reactors which has been used widely in practice for processing dilute solutions such as those encountered in waste water treatment and electroorganic synthesis where diffusion controlled reactions are involved [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The widespread use of the reactor is attributed to merits such as the high mass transfer coefficient, the uniform current and potential distribution, the low floor space occupied by the reactor and the possibility of continuous operation at low feed rate in order to increase the residence time, the high rate of mass transfer and the high residence time would increase the degree of conversion per pass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercial cells in studies about wastewater treatment have been designed for other applications (typically electrosynthesis); therefore, special considerations of wastewater treatment are sometimes disregarded. Three relevant cells are typically discussed in studies about the electrolysis of wastewater: the ElectroCell (ElectroCell A/S, Denmark), the FC01‐LC (formerly ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd.; currently INEOS Chlor‐chemicals, UK) and the DIACELL (formerly ADAMANT TECH; currently WaterDiam, Switzerland) . The first two cells were designed for the chlor‐alkali process and have to be adapted (or at least applied in different conditions) for application in studies about wastewater treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%