2022
DOI: 10.3390/f13020220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Environmental Performance between Construction Materials and Operational Energy of Nearly Zero-Energy Wood-Based Educational Building

Abstract: This paper focused on the environmental performance of a nearly zero-energy wood-based educational building (NZEB-W) via the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). It identifies the environmental impacts of construction materials and operational energy demands of the NZEB-W and compares them using the SimaPro 8 software with the IMPACT 2002+ method. The LCIA results from NZEB-W show that the overall environmental impact of construction materials (98.9 Pt) and 45 years operational energy demands (98.6 Pt) will be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of studies (55%) adopted a cradle-to-grave boundary, that is, the object of analysis was the entire life cycle of the product, from the extraction of raw materials to disposal or recycling (Chiniforush Around 39% of the studies adopted a cradle-to-gate boundary, that is, they considered the life cycle from the extraction of raw materials to some point in the life cycle of the product system (Chen, Pierobon, Ganguly, 2019;Connolly et al, 2018;Salles e Portugal et al, 2018;Mitterpach, Igaz, Stefko, 2020;Pal et al, 2017;Pierobon et al, 2019;Puettmann, Sinha, Ganguly, 2019;Robertson, Lam, Cole, 2012;Santi et al, 2016;Skullestad, Bohne, Lohne, 2016;Takano et al, 2014;Zeitz, Griffin, Dusicka, 2019;Zigart et al, 2018). The gate-to-gate boundary was the least adopted and covered only 6% of the selection (Dong et al, 2019).…”
Section: System Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies (55%) adopted a cradle-to-grave boundary, that is, the object of analysis was the entire life cycle of the product, from the extraction of raw materials to disposal or recycling (Chiniforush Around 39% of the studies adopted a cradle-to-gate boundary, that is, they considered the life cycle from the extraction of raw materials to some point in the life cycle of the product system (Chen, Pierobon, Ganguly, 2019;Connolly et al, 2018;Salles e Portugal et al, 2018;Mitterpach, Igaz, Stefko, 2020;Pal et al, 2017;Pierobon et al, 2019;Puettmann, Sinha, Ganguly, 2019;Robertson, Lam, Cole, 2012;Santi et al, 2016;Skullestad, Bohne, Lohne, 2016;Takano et al, 2014;Zeitz, Griffin, Dusicka, 2019;Zigart et al, 2018). The gate-to-gate boundary was the least adopted and covered only 6% of the selection (Dong et al, 2019).…”
Section: System Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood is a viable material that is suitable for use in different applications. In civil construction, it has been highly recommended worldwide because of its sustainability since it is a renewable natural resource with low energy consumption and a great contribution to reducing greenhouse gases [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the construction sector, non-renewable resources such as steel, cement and concrete are used as the primary material, emitting considerable amounts of CO 2 during the processing, affecting the environmental climate and consuming large amounts of energy. According to statistics, energy consumption in the building sector reaches around 40% of the total global energy consumption [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Therefore, the extensive use of green and renewable resources in the construction sector is a decisive step toward promoting sustainable social development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%